Skip to main content

To: County Commissioner and Planning Commission

Amendment to Public Notice for Conditional Use Permit

We, the undersigned, ask Juab County to amend its public notification requirements for Conditional Use Permits.

Property owners within 1,000 feet of a proposed Conditional Use Permit should receive direct mailed notice before the public hearing.

Posting a hearing online, in a newspaper, or on the Utah Public Notice Website does not ensure that the people living closest to a proposed use actually know about it.

If a proposed Conditional Use Permit may directly affect neighboring property owners, those property owners deserve direct notice and a meaningful opportunity to participate before a decision is made.

We ask the Juab County Planning Commission and County Commission to amend the Land Use Code to require mailed notification to property owners within 1,000 feet of all proposed Conditional Use Permits

Why is this important?


The current public notification process is not adequately reaching the landowners who may be most directly affected by major development decisions.

When a significant project is proposed through a Conditional Use Permit rather than a zoning change, neighboring property owners may not receive direct notice. Unless they happen to regularly check a newspaper, county website, or public notice website, they may have no idea that a hearing is taking place or that a major new use is being considered near their property.

That matters because the zoning process exists for a reason. When a proposed use is substantially different from the existing zoning of an area, requiring a zoning change provides greater transparency and public involvement before that change occurs. When a Conditional Use Permit is used instead, direct notification of neighboring landowners becomes especially important.

A notice posted somewhere online may technically be public, but that does not mean the people most affected actually see it.

Landowners should not discover after a decision has been made that a major development was approved near their homes or property without ever having known there was a hearing.

Requiring mailed notice to property owners within 1,000 feet is a simple and reasonable safeguard. It does not stop development. It ensures transparency, gives affected landowners an opportunity to participate, and helps preserve public trust in the land-use process.

The people closest to the impact should not be the last to know.

Updates

2026-09-08 19:48:05 -0400

100 signatures reached

2026-09-08 17:30:15 -0400

50 signatures reached

2026-09-08 16:15:55 -0400

25 signatures reached

2026-09-08 15:27:29 -0400

10 signatures reached