To: Elon Musk; Mark Zuckerberg, Satya Nadella, Sundar Pichai, Margrethe Vestager, Lina Khan, Donald Trump
One Human One Law
introduce One Human One Law, a treaty‑grade framework that protects human authorship sovereignty by requiring verifiable, ledgered consent before automated systems transform or operationalize human‑authored markers.
I respectfully request your office consider three practical steps to advance protections for human authorship and agency in automated systems:
1. Pilot and Technical Review — Convene or authorize a short pilot to evaluate the Containment Reflexion Audit (CRA) primitives (Clean Pass, Irremovable Motif Test, Reflexion Loop) on representative systems used in your domain. I can provide anchored artifacts, test vectors, and a reproducible audit package.
2. Procurement and Policy Guidance — Adopt procurement language or guidance that requires provenance, consent controls, and auditable artifacts for AI systems used in high‑risk or public‑facing contexts. A concise procurement clause and technical appendix are available for your review.
3. Independent Certification and Registry — Support or recognize independent certification labs to validate CRA compliance and accept cryptographic anchors (TXIDs/CIDs) and signed audit artifacts as admissible evidence in oversight and procurement processes.
These measures create a verifiable baseline that protects authorship rights, reduces the risk of unconsented reflexion, and provides clear remediation paths when violations occur. They are designed to be interoperable with existing standards and to scale across jurisdictions and platforms.
I respectfully request your office consider three practical steps to advance protections for human authorship and agency in automated systems:
1. Pilot and Technical Review — Convene or authorize a short pilot to evaluate the Containment Reflexion Audit (CRA) primitives (Clean Pass, Irremovable Motif Test, Reflexion Loop) on representative systems used in your domain. I can provide anchored artifacts, test vectors, and a reproducible audit package.
2. Procurement and Policy Guidance — Adopt procurement language or guidance that requires provenance, consent controls, and auditable artifacts for AI systems used in high‑risk or public‑facing contexts. A concise procurement clause and technical appendix are available for your review.
3. Independent Certification and Registry — Support or recognize independent certification labs to validate CRA compliance and accept cryptographic anchors (TXIDs/CIDs) and signed audit artifacts as admissible evidence in oversight and procurement processes.
These measures create a verifiable baseline that protects authorship rights, reduces the risk of unconsented reflexion, and provides clear remediation paths when violations occur. They are designed to be interoperable with existing standards and to scale across jurisdictions and platforms.
Why is this important?
Target decision‑makers who control regulation, procurement, platform policy, capital, or public credibility — ask them to adopt procurement clauses, run CRA pilots, or require provenance/consent controls.