To: Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, California Supreme Court
Remove Supervising Family Court Judge Julie Palafox

Letter Regarding Removal of Judge Julie A. Palafox
I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the conduct and decisions of Judge Julie A. Palafox of the Orange County Superior Court, and to urge that her removal from the bench be considered.
Numerous public comments and firsthand accounts—including those published on reputable judicial review platforms—highlight troubling patterns in Judge Palafox’s courtroom. For example, on The Robing Room, where litigants and attorneys can share their experiences with California judges, several individuals have raised serious allegations against Judge Palafox (see The Robing Room: Judge Julie A. Palafox).
Among the most concerning claims is that Judge Palafox allegedly violated a litigant’s rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and that she interrupted a court hearing to conduct an ex parte conversation with an unknown party before assigning a guardian ad litem to the litigant—an action that, according to the commenter, was unusual and raised questions about due process and impartiality. The guardian was reportedly instructed not to advocate for the litigant’s interests, further undermining confidence in the fairness of the proceedings.
Other accounts on the same review page describe a lack of transparency, inconsistent application of judicial procedures, and litigants feeling unheard or underserved. While Judge Palafox has been recognized for her efforts to streamline court processes, these positive actions do not negate the gravity of the complaints regarding due process and fair treatment.
Public trust in the judiciary is essential to the proper functioning of our legal system. When judges are alleged to have acted in ways that compromise impartiality, transparency, or respect for litigants’ rights—as documented in the referenced comments—it is critical that these concerns be thoroughly investigated.
I urge the appropriate authorities to review the allegations against Judge Julie A. Palafox, as detailed on The Robing Room and other relevant sources, and, if substantiated, to take action to remove her from the bench. The integrity of our justice system depends on holding judges to the highest standards of conduct.
Sincerely,
The People of Orange County, California
The People of Orange County, California
References:
- The Robing Room: Judge Julie A. Palafox
https://therobingroom.com/state/CA/judge/24488/Hon.%20Julie%20A.%20Palafox/comments
Why is this important?
It is important to campaign for the removal or accountability of a judge—such as Julie A. Palafox—because the integrity and fairness of our courts are foundational to a just society. Judges wield immense power over people’s lives, making decisions that affect families, freedoms, and futures. When judges are alleged to act unfairly, with bias, or in ways that undermine due process, public trust in the judiciary erodes, and people may suffer real harm123.
Other people should join the campaign for change for several reasons:
- Protecting Due Process and Fairness
Judges are entrusted to decide cases based on facts and law, free from bias or improper influence. When there is credible evidence of misconduct—such as ex parte communications, disregard for litigants’ rights, or inconsistent application of the law—it threatens the fairness of the legal system for everyone23. - Ensuring Judicial Accountability
The judiciary is not above scrutiny. Public oversight and accountability mechanisms, such as judicial conduct commissions, are essential to ensure judges act ethically and responsibly. Collective action can help bring attention to misconduct and push for investigations or reforms31. - Restoring Public Trust
When judges act improperly, public confidence in the courts diminishes. By joining a campaign for change, individuals help restore trust in the legal system, ensuring that it serves all people, not just the powerful or well-connected12. - Empowering Community Action
Grassroots movements and public engagement are powerful tools for change. By working together, people can influence judicial appointments, support reforms, and ensure that judges reflect the values and needs of the community43. - Preventing Future Harm
Addressing judicial misconduct now helps prevent similar problems in the future, protecting vulnerable individuals and families from unfair treatment in the courts43.
In summary, joining this campaign is about upholding justice, protecting rights, and ensuring that the courts remain accountable to the people they serve. Collective action is essential for meaningful reform and for building a legal system that truly works for everyone143.
- https://demandjustice.org/priorities/reforming-the-courts/
- https://www.michbar.org/file/barjournal/article/documents/pdf4article920.pdf
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoFsPuqltiA
- https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/what-movements-do-to-law/
- https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=facpub
- https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/state-judicial-selection-reforms-to-promote-a-fair-and-independent-judiciary/
- https://www.americanprogress.org/article/structural-reforms-federal-judiciary/
- https://afj.org/why-courts-matter/supreme-court-reform/
- https://www.urban.org/research/publication/community-engagement-strategies-advance-justice-reform
- https://www.sentencingproject.org/sentencing-reform-state-campaigns/