To: President Donald Trump, The United States House of Representatives, and The United States Senate
Abolish U.S. Court of Appeals
This petition is to demand Congress abolish the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Appeals Court). Taxpayer dollars were used to establish a formidable Jim Crow network within the Federal Circuit that uses institutional racism. The Jim Crow network could not exist without the protection of the Appeals Court. Appeals Court judges knowingly and willingly lied to defend and preserve the use of taxpayer money for institutional racism. This court was created by Congress with passage of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982. Congress appropriated about $32.5 million dollars in FY 2012 to operate this court. The $32.5 million could be better spent by providing about 125,000 head start children breakfast for about 260 days a year. Congress last abolished a court in 1913.
It is about a 5-minute exercise for Congress to verify the Appeals Court judges lied to defend and preserve using taxpayer dollars for institutional racism.
The law: Federal statute § 838.101; (2) in executing court orders under this part, OPM must honor the clear instructions of the court.
State Court order: I was entitled to 50% of the 47.38% in retirement benefits the order stated I earned between 08-05-78 and 11-08-92. The order classified these benefits as community property retirement benefits. The order stated I was entitled to 100% of the separate property retirement benefits, defined as the retirement benefits I earned before the date of marriage (08-05-78) and after the date of separation (11-08-92).
Numbers used by OPM to calculate and apportion my retirement:
The Appeals Court Opinion: A GOOGLE search of United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit case 2007-3090 HORACE M. CHAMBERS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT:
BACKGROUND
The source of Mr. Chambers’s complaint is an order by the Superior Court of California issued in connection with his divorce from Patricia Chambers. The court awarded Ms. Chambers 24 percent of Mr. Chambers’s gross monthly annuity under the Federal Civil Service Retirement System, and directed the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) to pay that portion of the annuity directly to Ms. Chambers. OPM found that the order was acceptable for processing, and it began sending Ms.
Chambers a 24 percent share of his annuity payments
The above wording by the Appeals Court clearly provides the Jim Crow process used to defend and preserve using taxpayer dollars for institutional racism. The Jim Crow network works as a team and tells the same lie to defend and preserve institutional racism. My complaint was that OPM should have rejected the state court order because it was not in accordance with Federal statute or honor the instructions for both parties as provided by Federal statute. The Jim Crow network falsely states what my complaint is in order to conceal the racist act that already occurred. I could care less what they paid ex-spouse, if it was not illegally taken from me. In accordance with the state court order I was entitled to 23.38% of the community property (47.38% - 24% to ex-spouse) and a little over 35% in separate property interest rather than the 16.04% actually used by OPM. The Jim Crow team intentionally excluded the law and the time periods specified in the state court order in order to subject me to institutional racism. Federal statute provides that I earned 1.5% for each of the first 5 years of service, 1.75% for the each of the next 5 years and 2% for each year thereafter. The court order stated that I earned 47.38% in community property retirement benefits between 08-05- 78 and 11-08-92. The 47.38% was accepted and used by the entire Jim Crow network even though by Federal statute I earned about 28% during the specified time period.
In sum, these are the taxpayer funded oversight agencies that have banded together to practice, defend and preserve use of tax payer dollars for institutional racism. The individuals within have willingly and knowingly lie because there have never been any adverse consequences. If enough people sign this petition it will force Congress to dismantle the Jim Crow network within the Federal Circuit.
It is about a 5-minute exercise for Congress to verify the Appeals Court judges lied to defend and preserve using taxpayer dollars for institutional racism.
The law: Federal statute § 838.101; (2) in executing court orders under this part, OPM must honor the clear instructions of the court.
State Court order: I was entitled to 50% of the 47.38% in retirement benefits the order stated I earned between 08-05-78 and 11-08-92. The order classified these benefits as community property retirement benefits. The order stated I was entitled to 100% of the separate property retirement benefits, defined as the retirement benefits I earned before the date of marriage (08-05-78) and after the date of separation (11-08-92).
Numbers used by OPM to calculate and apportion my retirement:
The Appeals Court Opinion: A GOOGLE search of United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit case 2007-3090 HORACE M. CHAMBERS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT:
BACKGROUND
The source of Mr. Chambers’s complaint is an order by the Superior Court of California issued in connection with his divorce from Patricia Chambers. The court awarded Ms. Chambers 24 percent of Mr. Chambers’s gross monthly annuity under the Federal Civil Service Retirement System, and directed the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) to pay that portion of the annuity directly to Ms. Chambers. OPM found that the order was acceptable for processing, and it began sending Ms.
Chambers a 24 percent share of his annuity payments
The above wording by the Appeals Court clearly provides the Jim Crow process used to defend and preserve using taxpayer dollars for institutional racism. The Jim Crow network works as a team and tells the same lie to defend and preserve institutional racism. My complaint was that OPM should have rejected the state court order because it was not in accordance with Federal statute or honor the instructions for both parties as provided by Federal statute. The Jim Crow network falsely states what my complaint is in order to conceal the racist act that already occurred. I could care less what they paid ex-spouse, if it was not illegally taken from me. In accordance with the state court order I was entitled to 23.38% of the community property (47.38% - 24% to ex-spouse) and a little over 35% in separate property interest rather than the 16.04% actually used by OPM. The Jim Crow team intentionally excluded the law and the time periods specified in the state court order in order to subject me to institutional racism. Federal statute provides that I earned 1.5% for each of the first 5 years of service, 1.75% for the each of the next 5 years and 2% for each year thereafter. The court order stated that I earned 47.38% in community property retirement benefits between 08-05- 78 and 11-08-92. The 47.38% was accepted and used by the entire Jim Crow network even though by Federal statute I earned about 28% during the specified time period.
In sum, these are the taxpayer funded oversight agencies that have banded together to practice, defend and preserve use of tax payer dollars for institutional racism. The individuals within have willingly and knowingly lie because there have never been any adverse consequences. If enough people sign this petition it will force Congress to dismantle the Jim Crow network within the Federal Circuit.
Why is this important?
Judges from this court lies to defend and preserve taxpayer dollars for institutional racism. Yes