Holdings hearings where only men can testify about a woman's right to reproductive freedom and where tax exempt members of the clergy are asked to provide testimony about a subject they know nothing about is a travesty. I propose that hearings are held where clergy and certain members of congress must explain publicly why products for men should not also be banned.
Why is this important?
The uproar over providing women with coverage for personal decisions related to reproductive care begs the question of why no uproar over products for men's sexual freedom.
