To: United States Fish and Wildlife Services and Con. Raul Grijalava and the U.S. House of Natural Resources

Do Not Delist Wolves Nation Wide !!!!!!!!

Delisting wolves nationwide is not based on science. In 2014 a federal judge ordered that the wolves of the great lake states be placed back on the endangered list due to the fact as stated by the judge the states of Wisconsin and Minnesota did not take into account that their wolf delisting management policy failed to ensure that the wolves of their respected states would be afforded, according to the ESA, an avenue in which they can migrate to known habitat in which they once lived.

We urge you to withdraw your nationwide delisting proposal!

Why is this important?

A nationwide delisting cannot be based on scientific review as claimed by the USFWS because this delisting rule will automatically deny the wolves the right to migrate to habitat which they once occupied. Also, wolves only occupy only around 5% of their original habitat, they are not recovered in the sense that they are nonexistent outside of the great lake states.
This proposed delisting states that it will be up to the individual states to manage wolves. In states like South Dakota wolves are already considered varmints and if delisted can be shot on site without a permit or quotas. Many other states have already stated that they do not want wolves in their states ---Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, Colorado. States that at one time had wolves but were exterminated from their states when the U.S. government sponsored a bounty program on wolves in the late 1800s and early 1900s and came very close to exterminating the wolves in the lower 48 states. If this delisting proposal succeeds in becoming a reality we will once again no doubt see the wolves existence in this country come to an end, just like before. This is an urgent petition ---many signatures are needed because the USFWS has drawn up the delisting proposal but has not been submitted to the National Register yet.