500 signatures reached
To: Family Law judges and Congress
No Contact means No Custody
Parents who receive no contact protection orders toward their children, meaning they were ordered by a judge to have no contact with that child should not have the right to file for any custody for that child.
Why is this important?
If a judge believes a parent is so unsafe that they should be given a no contact order against their own children or child they should not be allowed to file for custody for that child. This is truly common sense but an abuser should not be allowed to try to abuse the court system once a ruling has been ordered.
Obviously anyone can file a motion but when this is filed it should be immediately dismissed on the grounds of an active protection order. Abusers should not be given a loop hole to endless abuse victims in family court. Instead of providing these abusers with mediation and hearings the motion should be dismissed.
Obviously anyone can file a motion but when this is filed it should be immediately dismissed on the grounds of an active protection order. Abusers should not be given a loop hole to endless abuse victims in family court. Instead of providing these abusers with mediation and hearings the motion should be dismissed.