In a 5 to 3 vote along union to non union teacher ESP Board members, accused Knodel union member and teacher of sexual misconduct with minor allowed to continue to teach minors. The 3 Non Union members protest about the proven facts established during the trial and that Knodel was being allowed continued access to minors.
Why is this important?
This teacher of the year is currently under the wary eye of many parents and students while having access to students. It is only time until we let our guard down and Knodel commits his proven (as stated in the trial) unethical teacher's behavior with more students. We demand that ND ESPB be accountable to needs of the students and not to a union member. Union Member; how else do you explain the 5 to 3 vote?
