To: The Florida State House, The Florida State Senate, and Governor Ron DeSantis
PRIVACY RIGHTS - THE USE OF DRONES SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO GOVT FINANCIAL AUDIT-NOT US CITIZENS FUNDS
Public forums should began that discuss privacy laws by state legislators with citizens, whose residences are under surveillance - **the right to be notified by mail and phone**; as well as goals set as to when the privacy invasion will end (how to determine who is doing the surveillance - the Federal Government or unknown entitities etc.
Why is this important?
DRONES ARE BEING USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR SURVEILLANCE
WE NEED LAWS THAT PROTECT CITIZENS FROM CLOSER SURVEILLANCE, NOT SOCIETIES WHERE EVERY MOVE IS MONITORED BY GOVERNMENT
POLICE ARE BEING OFFERED THE OPTION OF ARMING THE REMOTE CONTROLLED AIRCRAFT (NON LETHAL CURRENTLY) THEY MAY ARM THEM WITH RUBBER BULLETS, TASERS, TEAR GAS
CONGRESS WANTS TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR POLICE IN THE USA TO USE THEM WITHOUT ANY PRIVACY PROTECTIONS
police can use them to peer into homes or track an individual's actions from afar
ACLU WANTS THESE SAFE GUARDS : USE OF A WARRANT, FOR AN EMERG, TO STOP A NEW CRIMINAL ACT
WHETHER THE POLICY BE REGULATED BY THE PUBLIC VS LAW ENFORCEMENT IS IN QUESTION AND WHETHER WEAPONS OF ANY KIND ARE PERMITTED
IT SHOULD ALSO BE SUBJECT TO OPEN FINANCIAL AUDITS
WHEN GOVERNMENTS MAKE STATEMENTS THAT THREATEN A SPECIFIC CULTURE - THE CULTURE RECEIVING HOSTILITY SHOULD BE NOTIFIED THEY ARE BEING PROTECTED
A DIFFERENTIATION SHOULD BE MADE BETWEEN DRONES USED FOR WILDLIFE AND THOSE INVOLVING CITIZENS
WE NEED LAWS THAT PROTECT CITIZENS FROM CLOSER SURVEILLANCE, NOT SOCIETIES WHERE EVERY MOVE IS MONITORED BY GOVERNMENT
POLICE ARE BEING OFFERED THE OPTION OF ARMING THE REMOTE CONTROLLED AIRCRAFT (NON LETHAL CURRENTLY) THEY MAY ARM THEM WITH RUBBER BULLETS, TASERS, TEAR GAS
CONGRESS WANTS TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR POLICE IN THE USA TO USE THEM WITHOUT ANY PRIVACY PROTECTIONS
police can use them to peer into homes or track an individual's actions from afar
ACLU WANTS THESE SAFE GUARDS : USE OF A WARRANT, FOR AN EMERG, TO STOP A NEW CRIMINAL ACT
WHETHER THE POLICY BE REGULATED BY THE PUBLIC VS LAW ENFORCEMENT IS IN QUESTION AND WHETHER WEAPONS OF ANY KIND ARE PERMITTED
IT SHOULD ALSO BE SUBJECT TO OPEN FINANCIAL AUDITS
WHEN GOVERNMENTS MAKE STATEMENTS THAT THREATEN A SPECIFIC CULTURE - THE CULTURE RECEIVING HOSTILITY SHOULD BE NOTIFIED THEY ARE BEING PROTECTED
A DIFFERENTIATION SHOULD BE MADE BETWEEN DRONES USED FOR WILDLIFE AND THOSE INVOLVING CITIZENS