To: President Donald Trump, The United States House of Representatives, and The United States Senate
Referendum on federal jury legislation
Pertaining to Jury selection and jurist rights. That a short bill should be introduced into the senate that includes the following;
a) That no person shall serve on a jury more than twice in 1 year.
b) That all jury members shall be read their full rights pertaining to the court jurisdiction they are working under. That these rights include in many cases the right to decide if a law is in itself just, and that they have in many higher courts the same rights as the judge, including the ability to throw a case out based on the legislation itself.
a) That no person shall serve on a jury more than twice in 1 year.
b) That all jury members shall be read their full rights pertaining to the court jurisdiction they are working under. That these rights include in many cases the right to decide if a law is in itself just, and that they have in many higher courts the same rights as the judge, including the ability to throw a case out based on the legislation itself.
Why is this important?
" Pertaining to Jury selection and jurist rights. That a short bill should be introduced into the senate that includes the following;
a) That no person shall serve on a jury more than twice in 1 year.
b) That all jury members shall be read their full rights pertaining to the court jurisdiction they are working under. That these rights include in many cases the right to decide if a law is in itself just, and that they have in many higher courts the same rights as the judge, including the ability to throw a case out based on the legislation itself."
a) That no person shall serve on a jury more than twice in 1 year.
b) That all jury members shall be read their full rights pertaining to the court jurisdiction they are working under. That these rights include in many cases the right to decide if a law is in itself just, and that they have in many higher courts the same rights as the judge, including the ability to throw a case out based on the legislation itself."