To: President Donald Trump, The Indiana State House, The Indiana State Senate, Governor Eric Holcomb, The United States House of Representatives, and The United States Senate
Requesting FBI To Investigate The malicious Prosecution of Steve Gilmore
"IC 35-41-3-2; “No person in this state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting the person or a third person by reasonable means necessary.”.
Judges instructions; “There has been evidence introduced in this case that the accused was exercising his right of self-defense."
“We (the jury) were unanimous on not guilty..."
and this is exactly what I said happen and in complete contrast to the States scenario
Pg 407 States forensic EXPERT.
Q.) Well, I mean for instance his feet. He could have been originally facing and then bent over looking in the window. That could create the proper angle.
A.) It's possible, yes.
-------------------------------
after, adamantly being told to leave, after trying to bust my door in, after having a warning shot put over his head as he was coming in the door,
shattering and covering him in glass, instead of being turned and running (EAST as was stated) he was "still"
"...facing (WEST) and then bent over looking in the window.That could create the proper angle. (digging for his gun)
A.) It's possible, yes."
--------------------------------
"...of any kind whatsoever ...."
"...accused was exercising his right of self-defense."
"...It's possible, yes." (that it happen exactely as I said it did)
"...unanimous on not guilty..."
are you the stupidest people in America or the most corrupt
a judge, suppressing the NOT GUILTY verdict in a self-defense case based upon a fabricated scenario so asinine the States own forensic expert refuted and debunked it in her ALTERED taped sworn testimony and which is ALL explicitly forbidden by IC 35-41-3-2
A judge
Suppressed A NOT GUILTY verdict
Altered Evidence
And was debunked by his own expert.of the whole scenario
"...of any kind whatsoever ...."
"...accused was exercising his right of self-defense."
"...It's possible, yes." (that it happen exactely as I said it did)
"...unanimous on not guilty..."
maliciously framed for murder...with altered evidence...after defending himself at home...
in a State that EXPLICITLY forbids ANY legal jeopardy of any kind "WHAT- SO- EVER" for defending oneself
who is then found NOT GUILTY within 30-60 minutes...
only to have the judge perjure himself to become the only judge in American history to suppress
a unanimous not guilty verdict...who then falsely accuses the defendant of abusing ineffective/negligent
court appointed counsel, in an attempt to unconstitutionally eliminate ALL defense counsel...
Judges instructions; “There has been evidence introduced in this case that the accused was exercising his right of self-defense."
“We (the jury) were unanimous on not guilty..."
and this is exactly what I said happen and in complete contrast to the States scenario
Pg 407 States forensic EXPERT.
Q.) Well, I mean for instance his feet. He could have been originally facing and then bent over looking in the window. That could create the proper angle.
A.) It's possible, yes.
-------------------------------
after, adamantly being told to leave, after trying to bust my door in, after having a warning shot put over his head as he was coming in the door,
shattering and covering him in glass, instead of being turned and running (EAST as was stated) he was "still"
"...facing (WEST) and then bent over looking in the window.That could create the proper angle. (digging for his gun)
A.) It's possible, yes."
--------------------------------
"...of any kind whatsoever ...."
"...accused was exercising his right of self-defense."
"...It's possible, yes." (that it happen exactely as I said it did)
"...unanimous on not guilty..."
are you the stupidest people in America or the most corrupt
a judge, suppressing the NOT GUILTY verdict in a self-defense case based upon a fabricated scenario so asinine the States own forensic expert refuted and debunked it in her ALTERED taped sworn testimony and which is ALL explicitly forbidden by IC 35-41-3-2
A judge
Suppressed A NOT GUILTY verdict
Altered Evidence
And was debunked by his own expert.of the whole scenario
"...of any kind whatsoever ...."
"...accused was exercising his right of self-defense."
"...It's possible, yes." (that it happen exactely as I said it did)
"...unanimous on not guilty..."
maliciously framed for murder...with altered evidence...after defending himself at home...
in a State that EXPLICITLY forbids ANY legal jeopardy of any kind "WHAT- SO- EVER" for defending oneself
who is then found NOT GUILTY within 30-60 minutes...
only to have the judge perjure himself to become the only judge in American history to suppress
a unanimous not guilty verdict...who then falsely accuses the defendant of abusing ineffective/negligent
court appointed counsel, in an attempt to unconstitutionally eliminate ALL defense counsel...
Why is this important?
He was Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman...only he was at home being attacked by an armed man...and won...and have been wrongfully persecuted every since...was Ihe suppose to lose and lose his life to be afforded his legal and constitutional rights why is he not the victim...? Because he won and saved his life?