To: Doris Okada Matsui, U.S. Representative for California's 6th district, Julie Brown, Enforcement Analyst, California Board of Psychology, George Miller, Senior Democrat on the Education and the Workforce Committee; H.R. Bill 3126 Stop Chi...
Save My Son (all children from abuse)
On January 25, a Marin County Family Court Mediator wrote a RECOMMENDATION that puts my son in harms way, that includes false statements, that lists the wrong court date, and that lacks due diligence required by this powerful position in determining a child's HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE. This court mediator's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION has endangered my child with the reckless endorsement of a Troubled Teen Residential Facility, Utah, for my son that is not troubled. My child is not troubled as determined by his Superior Intelligence and Neuropsychological Report, by the current Developmental Pediatric Behaviorists' therapists statement that my son is not depressed, nor truant, nor a user of recreational drugs #substantiated by a drug test#. The attack on my son is because he has ADHD, diagnosed since the second grade, with a corresponding Individual Educational Program #IEP#. His performance has been constant with high test results, retained comprehension with failing grades for lack of homework.
How many other families and children must be subjected to the Marin County Family Court Mediator's production of reckless CUSTODY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that ignore due diligence and endorse Troubled Teen Residential Facilities all to the detriment of children?
It is time to stop the Marin County Family Court endorsement of child abuse. It is time to STOP CHILD ABUSE through unregulated Troubled Teen Residential Facilities now and STOP the MARIN COUNTY COURT MEDIATOR from putting my son in harms way.
Will you sign my petition too? Click here to add your name:
How many other families and children must be subjected to the Marin County Family Court Mediator's production of reckless CUSTODY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that ignore due diligence and endorse Troubled Teen Residential Facilities all to the detriment of children?
It is time to stop the Marin County Family Court endorsement of child abuse. It is time to STOP CHILD ABUSE through unregulated Troubled Teen Residential Facilities now and STOP the MARIN COUNTY COURT MEDIATOR from putting my son in harms way.
Will you sign my petition too? Click here to add your name:
Why is this important?
Petition Update
1) Matthew was not sent to the Troubled Teen Residential Facility (TTRF) on legal record, but to another TTRF program in Bend, OR.
2) Matthew was not sent away for eight weeks on legal record, but for twelve.
3) Information regarding Matthew’s true location was withheld for over 8 weeks. The police report shows that Matthew’s location was withheld from the police too.
4) TTRF, OR, contacted me a few days later, a phone conversation with Matthew was established, and a handwritten letter from Matthew was received. My visitation was denied and then approved, but information regarding the location of the “field”, 1.5 hour from base camp, was withheld.
5) FBI SF agreed with my evidence and contacted TTRF. My travel partner was approved.
6) Next, TTRF denied my visitation.
7) FBI OR was contacted. FBI Oregon advised me to contact the police to check on Matthew in Bend Oregon which I did. I expressed concern of Matthew’s treatment, medications, psychological testing, isolation from family, extreme conditions, conflicting information in his letter, handwriting exercises when diagnosed with dysgraphia, all suggest Stockholm Syndrome tactics further evidenced by the withholding of basic information including the FTC, Dept. of Consumer Affairs, Article 0185 (Google it) and the House of Representatives Bill H.R. 3126: The Stop Child Abuse in Residential Program for Teens Act (Google it). I was concerned Matthew would be relocated out of the country.
8) Matthew was transferred to a boarding school in Central America where he resides.
9) The Marin County Family Court has since put a restraining order against me from contacting Matthew’s boarding school in Central America, and from contacting any government authorities even if child abuse is suspected.
10) Upon being contacted by the boarding school, an exchange of information was underway to facilitate communication, a new email and Skype account and visitation was proposed.
11) Subsequently, legal counsel threatened me with sanctions for being in violation of the restraining order to only receive information thus preventing me from obtaining information that would facilitate the allowed communication and visitation.
12) Is that entrapment?
If you have had a similar experience with the Marin County Family Court endorsement of child abuse neglect or worse, please let me know. Mia Lilien, P.O. Box 884, Mill Valley, CA 94942.
1) Matthew was not sent to the Troubled Teen Residential Facility (TTRF) on legal record, but to another TTRF program in Bend, OR.
2) Matthew was not sent away for eight weeks on legal record, but for twelve.
3) Information regarding Matthew’s true location was withheld for over 8 weeks. The police report shows that Matthew’s location was withheld from the police too.
4) TTRF, OR, contacted me a few days later, a phone conversation with Matthew was established, and a handwritten letter from Matthew was received. My visitation was denied and then approved, but information regarding the location of the “field”, 1.5 hour from base camp, was withheld.
5) FBI SF agreed with my evidence and contacted TTRF. My travel partner was approved.
6) Next, TTRF denied my visitation.
7) FBI OR was contacted. FBI Oregon advised me to contact the police to check on Matthew in Bend Oregon which I did. I expressed concern of Matthew’s treatment, medications, psychological testing, isolation from family, extreme conditions, conflicting information in his letter, handwriting exercises when diagnosed with dysgraphia, all suggest Stockholm Syndrome tactics further evidenced by the withholding of basic information including the FTC, Dept. of Consumer Affairs, Article 0185 (Google it) and the House of Representatives Bill H.R. 3126: The Stop Child Abuse in Residential Program for Teens Act (Google it). I was concerned Matthew would be relocated out of the country.
8) Matthew was transferred to a boarding school in Central America where he resides.
9) The Marin County Family Court has since put a restraining order against me from contacting Matthew’s boarding school in Central America, and from contacting any government authorities even if child abuse is suspected.
10) Upon being contacted by the boarding school, an exchange of information was underway to facilitate communication, a new email and Skype account and visitation was proposed.
11) Subsequently, legal counsel threatened me with sanctions for being in violation of the restraining order to only receive information thus preventing me from obtaining information that would facilitate the allowed communication and visitation.
12) Is that entrapment?
If you have had a similar experience with the Marin County Family Court endorsement of child abuse neglect or worse, please let me know. Mia Lilien, P.O. Box 884, Mill Valley, CA 94942.