No campaign can be found for "".

You might be interested in these petitions

  • Protect our elections: Vote NO on Trump’s USPS nominees!
    Trump is quietly pushing through nominations for an unfamiliar, yet powerful position—the United States Postal Service (USPS) Board of Governors.  Just weeks before signing an executive order directing the USPS to determine who can vote by mail, he nominated four Republicans to fill vacancies on the board—breaking a longstanding tradition of bipartisan nominations. And the Senate could vote on them as soon as September.  The Board of Governors acts just like a board for a private company—overseeing the strategic direction and long-term goals of the USPS. Our postal service has a mandate to provide universal service to all people and plays a critical role in delivering ballots to Americans across the country. All things Trump wants to undermine with his nominations.  Of Trump’s 4 nominations to the board, 3 have expressed doubts about the results of the 2020 elections.  Trump is trying to weaponize the USPS in his attempt to control the outcome of this election to maintain power. Tell the Senate to say NO to his nominations and protect our freedom to vote.
    550 of 600 Signatures
  • Tell Congress: Rein In ICE! Protect Our Communities
    ICE and CBP’s violence is out of control. The agencies are acting with impunity thanks to the over $200 billion authorized by Congress with virtually no meaningful oversight. Congress must wrest back control and demand accountability by repealing the billions authorized for ICE and CBP.
    2 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Win Without War Picture
  • Stop the Flock: Demand Transparency for License Plate Surveillance Cameras
    There's a camera on a pole near my house. It's not there to catch red-light runners — it's there to read license plates, log them, and store where drivers were, every time they pass. These are automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras, most commonly made by Flock Safety, and they're now active in more than 5,000 U.S. communities, with well over 120,000 units installed nationwide. Most residents never voted on them, never saw the contract, and have no idea what happens to the data after their plate gets read. Here's what we already know, from the departments' own numbers: LAPD conducted an internal audit of its own camera system and found a 32.3% false-positive rate — nearly 1 in 3 alerts were wrong. That's not an activist's estimate. That's the department's own audit. A wrong "match" doesn't stay abstract — it means a real person getting pulled over, searched, or questioned for a car they don't own. The cameras themselves are usually owned by a private company, not the city. Local governments pay an ongoing subscription for access to the data — meaning a private business, not just elected officials, controls a growing record of where cars in a town go. And because location data collected commercially can often be bought by government agencies without a warrant, this same information can end up changing hands in ways most residents are never told about. This is already changing, because people are speaking up. Nearly 100 cities and counties across 28 states have canceled or rejected Flock contracts since 2021, and the pace is accelerating. Every one of those decisions started the same way: residents asking questions publicly, in front of the people who could actually act on them. We're asking for three specific things: 1. Public disclosure — Require any city considering or renewing an ALPR contract to publicly release the full contract terms and the system's documented false-positive rate before any vote. 2. Independent oversight — Require regular, public, independent audits of any active license-plate-reading program, with results reported to residents. 3. Close the data-broker loophole — Support federal legislation requiring a warrant before any government agency can purchase location data that would otherwise require one to collect directly. We're not asking anyone to ban this technology outright. We're asking for the basic transparency and oversight that should come with any system that tracks where people go.
    1 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Christopher Lee
  • STOP THE GERRYMANDERING OF GEORGIA
    In Georgia, there is a call to potentially redraw voting districts that aim to fracture the voice of communities that have historically been marginalized. This undermines not only the principle of equal representation but also disrespects the historical struggle for civil and voting rights. The impact of gerrymandering stretches far beyond just electoral disadvantages. It erodes trust in the political system, polarizes communities, and discourages voter participation. When boundaries are drawn solely for political gain, democracy itself is at risk. Our state deserves better; the people of Georgia deserve to cast their votes in a fair and just electoral system. Join Unite 4 America (YOU ARE GEORGIA) in standing up to gerrymandering in Georgia to protect the integrity of our elections and ensure every vote counts. Please Connect with Unite 4 America  at  https://www.unite4america.org/ Sign this petition to urge Georgia lawmakers to implement a non-partisan, independent redistricting commission committed to fair and equitable map drawing. Together, we can uphold the democratic principle of fair representation for all. Please sign this petition to make your voice heard and honor the legacy of our ancestors.  Please Join YOU ARE GEORGIA at    https://www.youaregeorgia.com Thank you!
    2 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Andrea Griffin
  • Block Flock and Protect Americans' Privacy and Data!
    Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPRs) from companies like Flock Safety are popping up across the country, photographing every vehicle that passes and logging them into massive nationwide databases, making it possible to track anyone’s movements. We’ve already seen this mass surveillance tool abused. ICE has used Flock to pursue immigrants without warrants. Kansas officers used ALPRs to track down a man who wrote an op-ed critical of the police department. A Colorado officer wrongfully accused a woman of theft based on Flock data and then refused to look at evidence proving her innocence. Tell your state and city elected officials: Cut contracts with Flock Safety, and pass strong regulations to protect our privacy and data!
    1,306 of 2,000 Signatures
  • End AI Art at Pinecrest Cadence
    We petition the administration of Pinecrest Academy Cadence to cease use of generative AI (artificial intelligence) inside Pinecrest Academy Cadence promotional material. We, the undersigned, are concerned in regards to the administration’s use of generative AI, especially when promoting a highly rated school with multiple electives relating to the arts. We believe generative AI is wasteful, careless, and will ruin the formal imagery Pinecrest strives to achieve.  Along with the unprofessional look of flyers made with generative AI, there are also ethical concerns such as the high amount of water and electricity being wasted when entering prompts into these AI applications. Concerns of importing photos of students into generative AI have also been raised, too. Companies such as OpenAI may use these photos for training its AI models, which many students (such as athletes) did not consent to when photographed.
    156 of 200 Signatures
    Created by Sofia Conrado
  • No new data center in North Loop!
    Legacy Investing, a Virginia-based company, has signed an agreement to purchase the former Minnesota Star Tribune printing plant in North Loop with plans to turn it into a 20-megawatt data center for artificial intelligence and cloud technology. But they are facing mounting opposition from local residents, who don’t want to see water resources depleted, electricity bills skyrocket, and noise pollution increase. This is not a done deal—the agreement is contingent on a permit. It’s clear that Minnesotans oppose this new development—and the City Planning Commission and the Minneapolis City Council have the responsibility to block it NOW.  Will you add your name?
    170 of 200 Signatures
  • Three Days Could Save a Life: Give Idahoans 72 Hours
    I’m asking the Idaho Legislature to pass, and Governor Brad Little to sign, a law requiring a minimum 72-hour waiting period between the purchase of any firearm and the buyer taking possession of it. In 2024, 437 Idahoans died by suicide. That is more than one person every day. We need to do more than talk about this problem after another person dies. We need practical steps that could prevent the next death. A 72-hour waiting period would still let someone buy and own a gun. It would not change who can legally own one. It would simply require a buyer to wait three days before taking possession. During a suicide crisis, three days can matter. They give someone time to calm down, call someone, or get help. They also give friends and family more time to notice that something is wrong and step in. Please add your name and ask Idaho lawmakers to give people those 72 hours.
    23 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Anastasia A
  • Sen. Patty Murray has stopped Trump & Hegseth’s war budget in its tracks. Urge her to hold the line!
    I commend your opposition to Trump and Hegseth’s Pentagon budget request. I urge you to hold the line against doling out the funds for this unjustifiable, record-breaking war budget, and to continue working to protect the health, food, and education programs on which our communities rely.
    16 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Win Without War Picture
  • Reverse Civil Service Board: Suspend Phoenix Officers Harris and Sue for 34 days
    We, the undersigned community members, demand that the Phoenix Civil Service Board immediately reverse its decisions to rescind the discipline of Phoenix Police Officers Benjamin Harris and Kyle Sue. Furthermore, we demand that both officers be placed on an immediate, unpaid 34-day suspension. This duration directly equals the exact amount of time an innocent, deaf man with cerebral palsy, Tyron McAlpin, was forced to spend locked in a jail cell due to the false reports and fabricated charges filed by these officers. Our Explicit Demands: 1. Overturn the Civil Service Board's Action: We call on the City Council and leadership to challenge the lack of transparency and push to reinstate immediate disciplinary measures against Officers Harris and Sue. 2. Implement a Mandatory 34-Day Suspension: Order an immediate 34-day unpaid suspension for both officers—one day of accountability for every single day Mr. McAlpin unjustly lost his freedom. 3. End Secret Disciplinary Reversals: Demand the Phoenix City Council reform the Civil Service Board to ensure all future appeal hearings, votes, and justifications regarding police misconduct are fully transparent and accessible to the public.
    43 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Samantha Cooley
  • Bring Backpacks Back to Penn-Trafford High School
    TLDR: In order to protect privacy of students and promote efficiency, we request backpacks back in the classroom. Student safety is extremely important, and I know that the administration has a responsibility to create a safe and secure learning environment. My concern is not with that goal. My concern is whether completely prohibiting backpacks, purses, fanny packs, and essentially all other carrying bags is the most effective or practical way to accomplish it. One of our biggest concerns is student privacy, particularly for menstruating students. Under the new policy, students are permitted to carry only a clear pencil pouch no larger than seven and a half by ten inches. That means a student who needs menstrual products or other private personal-care items either has to carry them visibly in a clear pouch or leave them in their locker. If those products are kept in a locker, a student who unexpectedly needs one during class has to leave instruction, use SmartPass, walk to their locker, retrieve the item, and return. Depending on where that student’s locker and classroom are located, that can take a significant amount of time. During a lecture, quiz, or test, that lost time matters. It may also put students in situations where they feel that they need to explain a private bodily issue to a teacher or administrator in order to justify why they need to leave class again or why they have exceeded a SmartPass time limit. Students should not have to choose between displaying personal products publicly and sacrificing instructional time to maintain their privacy. There are also broader problems involving access to normal school supplies. A seven-and-a-half-by-ten-inch pencil pouch simply cannot contain everything students may reasonably need throughout the day. Students carry chargers, calculators, planners, notebooks, books, project materials, folders, and supplies specific to certain courses. Without some type of carrying bag, students will either have to physically juggle these items through the hallways or make significantly more trips to their lockers. That raises another concern for us students. The handbook says that this policy is intended to create an efficient learning environment. However, if hundreds of students are making additional locker trips before class, during passing periods, and sometimes during instruction, I worry that the policy could actually create more hallway traffic and more lost instructional time rather than less. Locker location also matters. Not every student’s locker is conveniently located near every one of their classes. With limited passing time, students may have to choose between going to their locker for necessary materials and getting to class on time. The policy regulates the container rather than directly addressing the prohibited item. Students also continue to have access to their lockers throughout the school day. So if a prohibited item were brought into the building and stored in a locker, preventing students from carrying that bag from class to class would not remove the prohibited item from school property. If preventing weapons from entering the school is the concern, then measures that screen what is actually entering the building, such as walk-through metal detectors or other appropriate entry-screening systems, address that concern far more directly than prohibiting ordinary students from carrying bags throughout the school day. Otherwise, we risk creating a policy that is highly visible and highly inconvenient, but does not substantially prevent someone who has already decided to violate far more serious rules. Students who come to school every day intending to learn are the students most likely to follow this policy. Someone who intends to bring a weapon, vape, or other prohibited item into school has already decided to violate district rules. That is why prevention strategies should focus as directly as possible on detecting and preventing the prohibited item or behavior itself rather than placing the greatest burden on the students who were never creating the problem. There are several possible compromises the district could consider, including clear backpacks, size-restricted bags, school-approved bags, or allowing students a small opaque pouch for private personal-care items. The district could also establish clear exceptions for medical, accessibility, academic, and athletic needs. We are not asking the district to ignore safety concerns. I am asking that we consider whether there is a less restrictive and more directly effective way to address those concerns without creating unnecessary problems involving privacy, accessibility, instructional time, and students’ ability to function throughout a normal school day. School safety matters. But a good safety policy should not only appear to increase safety. It should be practical, effective, proportionate to the problem it is trying to solve, and supported by a clear explanation of how it actually reduces that problem. The student body respectfully asks the Board and administration to reconsider the current policy, hear student concerns before it is fully implemented, and explore alternatives that protect both student safety and students’ ability to learn effectively. Thank you.
    1,484 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Riley Joyce
  • Stop Flock Surveillance Cameras in Logan County, Nebraska
    We, the residents and concerned citizens of Logan County, Nebraska, call on the Logan County Board of Commissioners to discontinue the use of Flock Safety automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras in our community. "Recently my colleagues at the ACLU of Massachusetts carried out a broad statewide open-records project, and among their findings is that Flock’s default agreement with police departments gives the company the right to share data with federal and local agencies for “investigative purposes” even if a local department chooses to restrict data to its own officers."             ~ Jay Stanley, a Senior Policy Analyst with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.  • It comes from his ACLU article “Flock Can Share Driver-Surveillance Data Even When Police Departments Opt Out, And Other Flock Developments,” published October 24, 2025 These cameras do more than simply photograph vehicles involved in crimes. They collect and store information about vehicles traveling through our community, creating records that can be searched and potentially accessed through law-enforcement data-sharing networks. Public safety is important, but so are privacy, transparency, accountability, and the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Residents should not have their movements routinely recorded simply because they drive on public roads. Before taxpayer money is used to maintain or expand this surveillance system, Logan County residents deserve clear answers about how the technology is being used, how often it has actually assisted local criminal investigations, what information is retained, who can access that information, and which outside agencies have access to Logan County's Flock network. We therefore ask the Logan County Board of Commissioners to terminate the county's use of Flock Safety cameras and refrain from renewing or expanding the program. At minimum, we ask that the program be suspended until its costs, effectiveness, privacy implications, data-sharing practices, and actual local law-enforcement use can be fully disclosed and reviewed in a public meeting. Public safety should not require giving up public accountability or the privacy of an entire community.
    31 of 100 Signatures
    Created by James Cole