No campaign can be found for "".

You might be interested in these petitions

  • Three Days Could Save a Life: Give Idahoans 72 Hours
    I’m asking the Idaho Legislature to pass, and Governor Brad Little to sign, a law requiring a minimum 72-hour waiting period between the purchase of any firearm and the buyer taking possession of it. In 2024, 437 Idahoans died by suicide. That is more than one person every day. We need to do more than talk about this problem after another person dies. We need practical steps that could prevent the next death. A 72-hour waiting period would still let someone buy and own a gun. It would not change who can legally own one. It would simply require a buyer to wait three days before taking possession. During a suicide crisis, three days can matter. They give someone time to calm down, call someone, or get help. They also give friends and family more time to notice that something is wrong and step in. Please add your name and ask Idaho lawmakers to give people those 72 hours.
    14 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Anastasia A
  • Sen. Patty Murray has stopped Trump & Hegseth’s war budget in its tracks. Urge her to hold the line!
    I commend your opposition to Trump and Hegseth’s Pentagon budget request. I urge you to hold the line against doling out the funds for this unjustifiable, record-breaking war budget, and to continue working to protect the health, food, and education programs on which our communities rely.
    9 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Win Without War Picture
  • Reverse Civil Service Board: Suspend Phoenix Officers Harris and Sue for 34 days
    We, the undersigned community members, demand that the Phoenix Civil Service Board immediately reverse its decisions to rescind the discipline of Phoenix Police Officers Benjamin Harris and Kyle Sue. Furthermore, we demand that both officers be placed on an immediate, unpaid 34-day suspension. This duration directly equals the exact amount of time an innocent, deaf man with cerebral palsy, Tyron McAlpin, was forced to spend locked in a jail cell due to the false reports and fabricated charges filed by these officers. Our Explicit Demands: 1. Overturn the Civil Service Board's Action: We call on the City Council and leadership to challenge the lack of transparency and push to reinstate immediate disciplinary measures against Officers Harris and Sue. 2. Implement a Mandatory 34-Day Suspension: Order an immediate 34-day unpaid suspension for both officers—one day of accountability for every single day Mr. McAlpin unjustly lost his freedom. 3. End Secret Disciplinary Reversals: Demand the Phoenix City Council reform the Civil Service Board to ensure all future appeal hearings, votes, and justifications regarding police misconduct are fully transparent and accessible to the public.
    39 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Samantha Cooley
  • Bring Backpacks Back to Penn-Trafford High School
    TLDR: In order to protect privacy of students and promote efficiency, we request backpacks back in the classroom. Student safety is extremely important, and I know that the administration has a responsibility to create a safe and secure learning environment. My concern is not with that goal. My concern is whether completely prohibiting backpacks, purses, fanny packs, and essentially all other carrying bags is the most effective or practical way to accomplish it. One of our biggest concerns is student privacy, particularly for menstruating students. Under the new policy, students are permitted to carry only a clear pencil pouch no larger than seven and a half by ten inches. That means a student who needs menstrual products or other private personal-care items either has to carry them visibly in a clear pouch or leave them in their locker. If those products are kept in a locker, a student who unexpectedly needs one during class has to leave instruction, use SmartPass, walk to their locker, retrieve the item, and return. Depending on where that student’s locker and classroom are located, that can take a significant amount of time. During a lecture, quiz, or test, that lost time matters. It may also put students in situations where they feel that they need to explain a private bodily issue to a teacher or administrator in order to justify why they need to leave class again or why they have exceeded a SmartPass time limit. Students should not have to choose between displaying personal products publicly and sacrificing instructional time to maintain their privacy. There are also broader problems involving access to normal school supplies. A seven-and-a-half-by-ten-inch pencil pouch simply cannot contain everything students may reasonably need throughout the day. Students carry chargers, calculators, planners, notebooks, books, project materials, folders, and supplies specific to certain courses. Without some type of carrying bag, students will either have to physically juggle these items through the hallways or make significantly more trips to their lockers. That raises another concern for us students. The handbook says that this policy is intended to create an efficient learning environment. However, if hundreds of students are making additional locker trips before class, during passing periods, and sometimes during instruction, I worry that the policy could actually create more hallway traffic and more lost instructional time rather than less. Locker location also matters. Not every student’s locker is conveniently located near every one of their classes. With limited passing time, students may have to choose between going to their locker for necessary materials and getting to class on time. The policy regulates the container rather than directly addressing the prohibited item. Students also continue to have access to their lockers throughout the school day. So if a prohibited item were brought into the building and stored in a locker, preventing students from carrying that bag from class to class would not remove the prohibited item from school property. If preventing weapons from entering the school is the concern, then measures that screen what is actually entering the building, such as walk-through metal detectors or other appropriate entry-screening systems, address that concern far more directly than prohibiting ordinary students from carrying bags throughout the school day. Otherwise, we risk creating a policy that is highly visible and highly inconvenient, but does not substantially prevent someone who has already decided to violate far more serious rules. Students who come to school every day intending to learn are the students most likely to follow this policy. Someone who intends to bring a weapon, vape, or other prohibited item into school has already decided to violate district rules. That is why prevention strategies should focus as directly as possible on detecting and preventing the prohibited item or behavior itself rather than placing the greatest burden on the students who were never creating the problem. There are several possible compromises the district could consider, including clear backpacks, size-restricted bags, school-approved bags, or allowing students a small opaque pouch for private personal-care items. The district could also establish clear exceptions for medical, accessibility, academic, and athletic needs. We are not asking the district to ignore safety concerns. I am asking that we consider whether there is a less restrictive and more directly effective way to address those concerns without creating unnecessary problems involving privacy, accessibility, instructional time, and students’ ability to function throughout a normal school day. School safety matters. But a good safety policy should not only appear to increase safety. It should be practical, effective, proportionate to the problem it is trying to solve, and supported by a clear explanation of how it actually reduces that problem. The student body respectfully asks the Board and administration to reconsider the current policy, hear student concerns before it is fully implemented, and explore alternatives that protect both student safety and students’ ability to learn effectively. Thank you.
    1,409 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Riley Joyce
  • Stop Flock Surveillance Cameras in Logan County, Nebraska
    We, the residents and concerned citizens of Logan County, Nebraska, call on the Logan County Board of Commissioners to discontinue the use of Flock Safety automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras in our community. "Recently my colleagues at the ACLU of Massachusetts carried out a broad statewide open-records project, and among their findings is that Flock’s default agreement with police departments gives the company the right to share data with federal and local agencies for “investigative purposes” even if a local department chooses to restrict data to its own officers."             ~ Jay Stanley, a Senior Policy Analyst with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.  • It comes from his ACLU article “Flock Can Share Driver-Surveillance Data Even When Police Departments Opt Out, And Other Flock Developments,” published October 24, 2025 These cameras do more than simply photograph vehicles involved in crimes. They collect and store information about vehicles traveling through our community, creating records that can be searched and potentially accessed through law-enforcement data-sharing networks. Public safety is important, but so are privacy, transparency, accountability, and the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Residents should not have their movements routinely recorded simply because they drive on public roads. Before taxpayer money is used to maintain or expand this surveillance system, Logan County residents deserve clear answers about how the technology is being used, how often it has actually assisted local criminal investigations, what information is retained, who can access that information, and which outside agencies have access to Logan County's Flock network. We therefore ask the Logan County Board of Commissioners to terminate the county's use of Flock Safety cameras and refrain from renewing or expanding the program. At minimum, we ask that the program be suspended until its costs, effectiveness, privacy implications, data-sharing practices, and actual local law-enforcement use can be fully disclosed and reviewed in a public meeting. Public safety should not require giving up public accountability or the privacy of an entire community.
    26 of 100 Signatures
    Created by James Cole
  • Stop the Lawless Strikes in Latin America
    A disturbing series of lawless boat strikes off the coast of Latin America, amounting to extrajudicial murders, has neither stopped drug trafficking nor alleviated the overdose crisis. I urge you to end these illegal strikes by preventing taxpayer dollars from being used for these killings — money that could instead be used to protect funding for treatment, overdose prevention, research, and lifesaving services.
    8 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Win Without War Picture
  • Vote NO to Royse City TX data center
    With the construction of the BT Gateway data center located at 4989 County Road 2656, Royse City, TX. It will cause near by areas to suffer from air pollution, noise pollution, water pollution, and high electricity usage, over time making the land it’s built on uninhabitable by life along with surrounding land. Nobody wants this $384 million dollar trash built. This center has no benefits for our survival or comfort, it only serves to take from hard working people and local farmers. WE NEED TO FIGHT. Fill up the inboxes for Governor Greg Abbot and representatives Keith Self and Pat Fallon saying NO! With this petition we can grow awareness to the people of Royse City TX (who such as myself have not heard anything about this construction). 
    9 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Katelynn Haller
  • Stop Mass Deportations and Protect Families
    PETITION TO END MASS DEPORTATIONS AND PROTECT FAMILIES To: The President of the United States, Members of Congress, and Relevant Federal Officials Our Request We, the undersigned residents and community members, respectfully urge our federal government to reconsider policies and practices involving large-scale deportations and to pursue immigration enforcement approaches that protect families, uphold due process, and recognize the humanitarian impact of deportation on communities. Mass deportations can have consequences that extend beyond the individuals being removed. Families may be separated, children may lose parents or caregivers, and communities can experience significant disruption. We believe immigration laws should be enforced fairly and consistently while ensuring that individuals receive appropriate due process and that families and children are not unnecessarily placed in situations of hardship. We Call For: • An end to indiscriminate or mass deportation practices that unnecessarily separate families. • Protection for children and families affected by immigration enforcement. • Meaningful consideration of individual circumstances before removal proceedings are finalized. • Fair and accessible due process for individuals facing deportation. • Policies that prioritize serious threats to public safety while avoiding unnecessary family separation. • Greater transparency regarding immigration enforcement practices and their effects on affected communities. • Expanded access to qualified legal assistance for individuals navigating immigration proceedings. • Humane treatment of all individuals throughout immigration enforcement and detention proceedings. Our Statement We recognize that the United States has immigration laws and that the government has a responsibility to enforce those laws. At the same time, enforcement should be carried out in a manner consistent with due process, human dignity, family unity, and the best interests of children. We respectfully ask our elected and appointed officials to listen to the concerns of affected families and communities and to pursue immigration policies that balance lawful enforcement with compassion, fairness, and the protection of families.
    14 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Joane Bien-Aime
  • Stop TSA from handing our data to ICE
    ICE agents are infiltrating airports across the country and immigration arrests are surging, all because TSA is handing your passenger data to ICE.  In 2025, the Trump administration quietly struck a data-sharing agreement between TSA and ICE, handing over your name, birth date, and travel details every time you fly. It's since expanded far beyond its original scope. TSA is now flagging anyone with an expired visa, including people who are currently working with the federal government to renew their status or who have legal paperwork pending. The increased ICE presence and detentions happening at airports is putting all travelers at risk. No one should have to fear TSA security lines or domestic travel. Congress can shut this down right now. Earlier this month, representatives in Congress introduced the No TSA Data for ICE Act to end the TSA-ICE data-sharing agreement for good.  Add your name now and tell Congress to pass the No TSA Data for ICE Act! 
    666 of 800 Signatures
  • Stop a Dangerous Pentagon-IDF Partnership
    The inclusion of the “U.S.-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” makes the FY27 NDAA unjustifiable. Congress must stop a dangerous Pentagon-IDF partnership by rejecting the NDAA.
    13 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Win Without War Picture
  • Tell Meta: Don't use AI to fire workers with disabilities or medical conditions!
    A groundbreaking lawsuit accuses Meta of using AI tech to target people for layoffs who have disabilities, medical conditions, or took medical and family leave. The lawsuit alleges that amidst thousands of layoffs, Meta violated federal and state laws that protect employees who are pregnant, disabled, or on qualified leave. That would mean Meta used AI for workplace discrimination.   “Meta is taking away the entire purpose of a protected leave — to heal, to care for family, and to have protected time away from work to do so,” the lawsuit said. Meta, and all corporations, need to stop using AI tech to exploit workers. 
    12 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Coworker Team
  • The Removal of Club America from Hebron High School
    One of two items must occur, with the much preferred option being the first. 1 ) Club America needs to be absolved and entirely removed from the Hebron High School club roster and stop being promoted or supported by Hebron High School. 2 ) A Left-Leaning Club powered by a Non-Profit alike to TPUSA needs to be officially formed underneath the Hebron High School Club Roster and supported alike and equally to Club America.
    106 of 200 Signatures
    Created by Aidan Moseley Picture