100 signatures reached
To: Sen. Grassley, Counsel Edda Emmanuelli Perez the GAO, A.G. Merrick Garland, Governor Moore of MD
STOP NSA, DOJ, FBI & Judiciary from getting away with it!
Did the foundation of Federal Law change drastically in 100 days? On February 15, 2023, conspiring together, NSA, DOJ, DCIS, FBI, and the Judiciary unilaterally re-defined the practical application of the plain language of the law to convict Jacky McComber. 100 days later, on May 26, 2023, GDIT won a protest and financial compensation when the Government Accountability Office GAO - ruled against the Department of the Army in their attempt to mis-apply the restrictive statute of FAR 16.207 or FFP-LOE. Then on March 22, 2024, Judge Hollander published a 69-page opinion, bolstering her position with the use of 45-pages labeled as “factual summary”, citing testimony from a dozen NSA Acquisition Professionals contradicting GAO, in applying FAR 16.207, to deny a motion of acquittal for McComber. GAO’s ruling stated that under an FFP-LOE contract type the government stipulates a specified number of hours to be delivered by the contractor which must be delivered to obtain the intended results. The GAO specifically stated the words “estimate” and “ceiling” cannot be applied to an FFP-LOE type contract because the statute limits its use when the number of hours is not specified in advance. GAO’s ruling reinforces the government’s attempts to introduce ambiguous language did not comport with an FFP-LOE. Throughout the McComber case, the word “estimate” was used 65 times and the word “ceiling” used 18 times. In continuance, in her opinion, Judge Hollander used “estimate” 5 times, ambiguous language of “limited work/tasks” 4 times, “some” 9 times, and “classified” 5 times against McComber, intended results achieved does not denote LOE delivered - in clear opposition of GAO’s ruling. Daughter of career Naval Sailor, teacher turned technologist, mother of 4, EDWOSB Maryland business owner - not afforded the protection of big business, GDIT. Why is the same FAR statute being applied by GAO in their ruling for big business not being applied to small business, McComber? ACT NOW, demand legal and ethical review of the case aligned with the GAO ruling and set this mother of 4-free!
Why is this important?
ANYONE can be the next destroyed! Wrongful and biased prosecution defies the U.S. Constitution. EVERY person who works for or is a principal of a firm which contracts with the government can no longer trust in being protected by the laws included within the four-corners of a ratified contract. EVERY contractor is at risk of performing to contractual requirements and then retroactively being tried as a criminal. Congress' intentions directing the FAR into existence are no longer held with esteem. Judiciary and federal employees have been given the right to mis-apply laws to further their benefit. WHERE IS OUR SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES? WHERE IS EQUAL PROTECTION TO ALL?
How it will be delivered
Email, social media, through moveon.org distribution, word of mouth and sharing.