Changing Walton Dune’s Neighborhood Beach Access to Regional Beach Access will have a significant negative environmental impact, destroying dunes and a critical habitat area as designated by the US Fish & Wildlife Service. It will also increase safety and traffic concerns, as this area has neither outlet nor turnaround for public or emergency vehicles, and the added congestion created will exacerbate the already present overcrowding issues on the narrow road and small beach. More information can be found at 30abeachside.com. ---------------------------------------- 6/4/16 - Some confusion has surfaced by combining the issue of changing the Walton Dunes (NBA) into a Regional Beach Access an (RBA) and the issue of private landowner/customary land use. These are completely separate and distinct topics. The Walton Dunes Neighborhood Beach Access (NBA) has been a public access point not only for the neighborhood but the general community for decades. I hear no one suggesting that this access should or could be private. Opposition to the RBA is largely based on preventing the escalation of unsafe traffic conditions and preserving a pristine area for residents and visitors alike. The area in question is pristine. The dunes, which were decimated by Hurricanes Ivan and Dennis, are making a comeback. The Walton Dunes NBA was scraped clean when used by the county to remove debris from the beach area. The dunes now are several feet tall and growing each year. The area is home to nesting turtles, flora and fauna. Words from a song "They paved paradise to put up a parking lot" come to mind. The Walton Dunes NBA is located 1/2 mile from County Highway 30A off of Lakewood Drive. This area is congested; with no other outlet or turn around, narrow streets, blind corners and no continuous sidewalk to the beach. The area consists of hundreds of residential and multi-unit complexes, with construction at an all-time high. This area provides over 1,000 rental opportunities for individuals a day, not to mention the full time residents - most of which use the Walton Dunes NBA. When combined with pedestrian, bicycle, construction, service and local vehicular traffic, the traffic and safety concerns only escalate. The placement of a parking lot on Beachfront Trail will only magnify already dangerous conditions and will require several homeowner associations to drive through said parking lot to access their residences. If the goal is to provide additional access/parking to tourist and locals outside of the neighborhood (1/2 mile radius of the location in question), we must deal with reality. Changing the Walton Dunes Neighborhood Beach Access (NBA) into a Regional Beach Access (RBA) changes nothing except increasing traffic tension and paving a portion of this pristine area. The neighborhood who has learned to use the NBA "as is" will quickly park in the parking places and compete for what little beach is left after construction. This will bring us full circle, leaving those tourist and locals outside the neighborhood still frustrated with no access/parking and heavily used beach.

The proposed Pescadito dump will be bringing industrial, demolition and special wastes that are toxic into Webb County by rail and truck, from industries within an 800 mile radius. This includes materials like coal ash, which carries significant health risks for humans, livestock and most importantly, our air and water. Pescadito will also accept maquiladora and other industrial waste by rail from Mexico, which will not even be inspected until it has already crossed the Rio Grande. The proposed site is within the floodplain, on the Pescadito creek, which empties into the Rio Grande. Local landfills have more than 100 years of life remaining. We don't need this dump. Read more at http://NoLaredoDump.com. Sign this petition, or sign a paper petition when you see our volunteers in public. Just stand with us and CALL them out!

We applaud reforms outlined in Senator Sanders' plans for combating detriment to our ecosystem; however, there is one immensely destructive industry not addressed. Animal-agriculture is a major cause of climate-change pollution, water pollution, drought, water shortage, deforestation, land degradation, species extinction, and contributes to world hunger. We are calling to end animal-agriculture subsidies. The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) found animal-agriculture responsible for 14.5% - 18% of global greenhouse gas emissions - more than the entire transportation sector. Climate scientists published a report detailing missing data from the FAO's calculations, and pegged the real figure at a whopping 51%. In the 2000 National Water Quality Inventory conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency, agricultural activity was identified as a source of pollution for 48% of stream and river water, and for 41% of lake water. The top source of this pollution is the storage and disposal of animal waste. First, storage tanks often leak, rupture, or overflow. Second, the way the industry disposes of the waste is by spraying it onto farms as fertilizer; however, the farms produce far more waste than is needed for this application, so the (excessive) excess runs off into surrounding water systems. High levels of nitrogen and phosphorous, an effect of fertilizer runoff, is the most common form of water pollution in the United States. In addition, there are toxic substances in the animals’ excretions, such as pharmaceuticals and bacteria, which cause damage to the environment, wildlife, and human health. The amount of water used to raise animals for human consumption dwarfs the amount used for growing plants for us to consume. A hundred billion gallons of water is being exported from California each year - in the form of alfalfa, to feed livestock. That’s enough to provide for the yearly water usage of a million families. The UN estimates that by 2025, 1.8 billion people will be living in countries or regions with absolute water scarcity, and two-thirds of the world's population could be living under water stressed conditions. Occupying over half of Earth’s arable land; animal-agriculture is behind the majority of deforestation, land degradation, and species extinction. Despite these intensive impacts, it has been estimated that one in eight people still suffer from food scarcity - and it's only getting worse. According to the FAO, "the number of hungry is currently climbing at the rate of some four million a year." Animal-agriculture is in fact a contributor to world hunger. For example they use land in Africa to grow soybeans to feed to cattle in the United States instead of feeding soybeans to starving people in Africa. Even those still consuming products of animal-agriculture ought to end taxpayer money propping up this destructive industry, as many in the scientific and health communities have warned us of the need to curb consumption. Also, there are no two ways about it: animal-agriculture is unconscionably cruel to the individuals who are its commodities. In contrast; fruits, vegetables, legumes, grains, nuts, and seeds build health and prevent and reverse disease affordably with healthy carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, minerals, enzymes, antioxidants, and phytonutrients. Fruit trees and plants actually sequester carbon in the soil where it belongs. In light of all we know about industrialized animal-agriculture's devastating impacts on the health of the planet and people, as well as its inherently inhumane exploitation of sentient beings, it does not make sense for us to be subsidizing it. This is a case of the profits of a few taking precedence over the benefit of the many. Bringing an end to all funding, both direct and indirect, of animal-agriculture by the U.S. government would be a huge step with many positive effects, not the least of which is helping to reverse catastrophic environmental deterioration.

British corporation Oxitec has been working since 2011 to release genetically engineered (GMO) mosquitoes in Florida. These GMO mosquitoes would kill off one species of mosquito, but pave the way for possibly more-dangerous mosquitoes to move in, carrying harmful diseases like West Nile virus and dengue fever. Why release these biotech insects if they could cause the introduction of something worse? 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued an initial finding of "no significant impact" for allowing these mosquitoes to be released in the Florida Keys. Public comments on this finding are being accepted until May 13. Join us in telling the FDA that it's too risky to allow the release of GMO mosquitoes in Florida — or elsewhere.

Ever hear the classic conman expression “If you believe that, I’ve got a bridge to sell you”? Well, that’s exactly what Hawaii Gas is trying to do to the people of Hawai'i. They have a bridge to sell us called Liquefied Natural Gas or “LNG.” They tout LNG as a clean ‘bridge fuel’ to help save us money as it gets us to our clean energy future. Despite the deceptive propaganda from the Fossil Fuel Industry, LNG is neither clean nor will it save Hawai'i money. The truth is LNG is still a dirty fossil fuel that makes no economic sense for Hawai'i. The Hawai'i State Legislature has mandated that Hawai'i must be converted to 100% renewable energy sources by 2045. Then why would we want to invest millions of dollars to construct offshore docking facilities for huge LNG tankers, a pipeline system to bring in this volatile fuel onshore, and convert Oahu’s power plant to run on natural gas for something that's supposed to be temporary? Governor Ige has already declared this to be a pointless diversion and strongly opposes it. He knows it will waste time, energy and resources that are needed to meet the clean-energy mandate and address Climate Change in a meaningful way. If that weren’t enough, there’s also the issue that LNG comes from fracking. Fracking leaks methane gas, which turns out to be much worse at trapping heat in our atmosphere than carbon. The process of fracking also pollutes drinking water, damages the land, and causes earthquakes. Families living near fracking sites have high rates of birth defects, and fracking kills fish and wildlife. The people of Hawai'i want no part in this type of devastation. Bottom-line, the science is clear. If we are to keep below the tipping point for Climate Chaos and protect our ‘life support system’ i.e. the planet, scientists have confirmed we must take bold action now to stop burning fossil fuels. The reality is that the proposed LNG plans by Hawaii Gas will exacerbate the Climate Crisis by supporting the burning of fossil fuels for decades, and overlooks the costs Hawai'i is already paying the price for with our loss of coastline, coral reefs, and trades winds, not to mention the destruction caused to communities where fracking occurs. While Hawai'i is already feeling the effects of Climate Change, experts warn that as the climate further destabilizes, we can expect more and stronger hurricanes; severe damage to our economy; beach loss; more disease; closed hotels and lost jobs; water shortages; dying coral reefs; damaged infrastructure; higher average temperatures; decreased trade winds; periods of drought and heavy rain with flooding; sea water mixing with drinking water; endangered fisheries; stressed native animals and plants; increased spread of invasive species; and declining crop production. Hawaii Gas: This is not the future we wish to pass on to our keiki! We refuse to stand idly by and let short-sighted companies wreak havoc on us. We Say No To LNG!

Privatizing our water is a mistake. It'll enable a corporation to price-gouge us on our utility bills, and worse, if they cut corners -- which most private water utilities do -- they could cause devastating environmental disasters. Providence's water system serves most of the state of Rhode Island, so it's not just one city that would be in trouble. Cutting costs for short-term money is how Flint began its water crisis. Water is too important to risk. We all need it to live and we need it to be safe and clean for everyone. Source: http://wpri.com/2016/04/25/12-ways-providence-could-solve-its-money-problems/

Going green saves our Intuit Plano office thousands of dollars a year. And everyday choices you make can improve our impact even more. This is why we’re asking you to join us in reducing our collective impact by taking this pledge. Plus, when you sign this pledge, you'll be entered to win some fun Intuit swag. Will you join us? (Deadline: Friday, April 29th at 5 PM). THE PLEDGE: • I pledge to use my desk recycling bin properly. Recyclables go in the large blue bin. Waste goes in the smaller black bin. • I pledge to use a plate (not a compostable tray) when I eat in the cafeteria. • I pledge to compost all of my food waste using the compost bins in the cafeteria and in the breakrooms on my floor. • I pledge to turn off the lights when I leave a conference room. • I pledge to only put EMPTY containers (plastic and glass) and paper products in the recycling bin; plasticware, food wrappers, and soiled paper goes in the trash; and food and compostable containers go in the compost bin.

Don't like a court ruling? Then change the law! That's what A&B did with HB2501 water rights holdover bill. A&B is the ONLY entity with a fictional "holdover" permit, and this is a special interest bill illegally helping a single company. Don't fall for the A&B PR. It affects nobody but A&B. Nobody else wants it passed. The Court considered this carefully, but the Legislator was inundated with false talking points and most members don't even understand the issue or the bill itself. It is never a good idea to try and overrule a Court decision like this. Protect water users like those in Huelo whose stream is dry and who will face another 3 years of no water if this bill goes into effect.

Fracking is directly responsible for water contamination and other serious health and environmental problems. West Virginians can no longer afford allowing big fuel corporations to make record profits while poisoning our residents. Some are surrounded by gas wells to the extent that the land itself is unusable, some have experienced combustible tap water, and many more are suffering ill health as a result of the fracking industry. It is totally unacceptable for residents to bear this burden, especially when we see virtually none of industry profits. We deserve clean water, air, and soil, as well as safe job sites. West Virginia needs our elected officials to act by banning fracking now.

The wolf was nearly massacred into extinction, and the Mexican gray wolf is one of the most endangered of the species. The health of the Mexican wolf depends on healthy pack numbers, and the governor and certain representatives of Arizona are allowing special interests to stall and destroy the recovery program.

We are starting this petition because we care about the earth and maintaining enough fish to keep the ecosystem balanced.

The Wolf administration is working on a Clean Power Plan for Pennsylvania, but the plan is anything but clean. • The Clean Power Plan puts natural gas in the “clean” column • The Clean Power Plan guarantees reliance on natural gas • The Clean Power Plan doesn’t limit how much a state can rely on gas to meet its target • The Clean Power Plan institutionalizes and enables pollution • The Clean Power Plan means we can kiss a fracking moratorium or ban goodbye Pennsylvanians Against Fracking is asking for your support in telling Governor Wolf, DEP Secretary John Quigley, and Wolf’s energy advisor, David Sweet, that Pennsylvania urgently needs a real clean power plan. Learn more by reading Pennsylvanians Against Fracking’s statement on the CPP, available online at bit.ly/pafcpp