• Turn Water Back on to Standing Rock
    The Standing Rock Lakota Sioux have garnered nation wide support in their protest against the Dakota Access Oil Pipeline, and the popularity and strength of numbers of the movement is rapidly growing. In response, the state government has moved to cut off the drinking water supply to the camps of peaceful protesters on Monday, August 23. It is imperitive that we as the United States do not allow illness or fatalities to occur to these people as a result of irresponsible, reactionary water deprivation.
    59 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Sarah Hopper
  • President Obama: Protect the Grand Canyon from toxic mining
    America designated the Grand Canyon as a national park nearly 100 years ago. Unfortunately, the land surrounding the canyon was left out of the park and unprotected. Now, mining companies are pushing to start digging for uranium on that land. This summer, the National Park Service celebrates 100 years of land conservation. There is no better time to renew our commitment to protecting the best of America. That's why we're calling on President Obama to permanently protect the Grand Canyon from this toxic mining by declaring a new national monument before he leaves office.
    20,430 of 25,000 Signatures
    Created by Margie Alt, Environment America Executive Director
  • Stop The Dakota Access Pipeline
    The Dakota Access pipeline is set to be constructed near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota. The proposed Dakota Access Pipeline would transport 570,000 barrels of crude oil per day across four states. The potential of oil leaks would contaminate the only source of water for the reservation. Take action to ask the Army Corps of Engineers to stop the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
    2,687 of 3,000 Signatures
    Created by Drew Hudson
  • Protect California's Clean Air Laws
    UPDATE: The California legislature just passed SB 32 and AB 197. It's a huge victory, but our work is not done. *Sign the petition and urge legislators in the Assembly and the Senate to pass SB 1383. Short-lived climate super pollutants like methane pose a serious risk to the health and prosperity of all Californians, and the passage of SB 1383 is crucial to protecting our clean air for future generations. ### California has a long history of leadership and strong legislative action when it comes to protecting the state’s air quality and fighting climate change. From the Clean Air Act of 1970, to the Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) of 2006, California’s track record is second to none. With only two weeks left in California’s legislative session, there is an opportunity to extend California’s landmark climate legislation, AB 32, which requires greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. Big Oil has poured millions of dollars into attempts to weaken our clean air laws. The oil companies are focused on profits instead of our health and climate and are unrelenting in their efforts to weaken these crucial targets. By taking action now, we can stand up to the oil companies and strengthen our clean air laws. If passed, SB 32 and AB 197 would improve upon AB 32 by further reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, while strengthening California’s legislative authority and ensuring transparency and accountability. Legislators will also consider SB 1383, which works to reduce super-pollutants like black carbon, methane, and fluorinated gases. These super-pollutants threaten our climate, clean air, and our health. It’s largely low-income people of color who suffer the health consequences. It’s not right, and it’s time to take a stand against this injustice. We cannot let the oil companies defeat these important measures to strengthen our clean air laws because the facts show our clean air policies are working. We’ve cut toxic pollution, improved kids’ health, and created 500,000 clean energy jobs in California. Stand up to the oil companies and strengthen California’s clean air laws. Tell Governor Brown and legislators to continue standing strong against the oil companies.
    76 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Tom Steyer
  • We request the EPA and US Army Corps of Engineers deny the wetlands permit requested by Telluride...
    1. We vehemently oppose a site that destroys our valued wetlands and some 10,000 year old fens. The Town of Mountain Village failed to disclose to the EPA and the Army Corps that there are 2 rare fens adjacent to THD's proposed site. Both the Town of Mountain Village and THD failed to disclose to the EPA and the Army Corps that THD will destroy or seriously impact wetlands that are protected under an EPA management agreement. 2. We want a location that has access to all as equally as possible-including Ophir, Norwood, Placerville, Sawpit, the Town of Mountain Village and the Town of Telluride. 3. THD has failed, and refused outright, to provide a reliable study of financial feasibility for the new medical center with projected demographics and healthcare needs, most likely because it knows that the projected demographics and healthcare needs will not support a 40,000 square foot facility. THD has failed to consider the affect a large, new, publicly funded medical center would have on the existing local, privately owned, small health oriented businesses, including pharmacies and physical therapists. 4. There are viable and practicable alternative sites to the proposed location in Mountain Village and the alternative sites will have minimal environmental impacts. We, the signatories of this petition, ask the Telluride Hospital District Board of Directors to work with San Miguel County, the Town of Telluride, the Town of Mountain Village, EPA, the Army Corps of Engineers and others to find a site that meets with the above, in order to serve ALL members of our communities equally and respect our precious environmental habitat.
    145 of 200 Signatures
    Created by Concerned Citizens of Telluride Hospital District
  • Obama: Cancel the 8/24 fossil fuel auction in New Orleans
    Louisiana is in a state of emergency, and the Red Cross is calling the recent flooding the worst U.S. natural disaster since Superstorm Sandy. Yet, on August 24, the Obama administration is planning to sell off an area the size of Virginia for offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. This fossil fuel auction is set to take place in the New Orleans Superdome, just an hour's drive from Louisiana cities and towns that have just been ravaged by unprecedented floods. We need to keep fossil fuels in the ground and stop treating the Gulf Coast like a sacrifice zone. In the midst of a climate-fueled disaster, which will most gravely impact those already marginalized in our society, moving forward with this auction is a terrible idea. Selling fossil fuels at the New Orleans Superdome–the site of one of the most visible and tragic instances of climate injustice in recent memory–is nothing short of insulting. In this moment, we need to stand with Gulf communities who have been resisting the fossil fuel industry for decades. President Obama can allow the fossil fuel industry to carry on with business as usual, or he can stand with Louisiana residents who are living under a state of climate emergency. He can’t do both. We are calling on President Obama to cancel the upcoming fossil fuel auction and stop new offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico altogether.
    1,590 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Cherri Foytlin and 350.org
  • No new offshore oil leases in the Gulf of Mexico
    The recent flooding in Louisiana is the country’s ‘worst natural disaster’ since Superstorm Sandy. Yet, in a disastrous move that will put millions of Gulf state residents at risk and threaten the fight to combat climate change even further, the Obama administration is planning to auction to the highest bidder nearly 24 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico for offshore oil and natural gas exploration and drilling. The Obama administration calls this lease sale part of its “continued commitment to safe and responsible domestic energy production,” but there's nothing safe or responsible about opening an additional 23.8 million acres of the Gulf of Mexico to oil and gas drilling. These leases will go up for sale on August 24, so we need to act now to stop any further drilling in the Gulf of Mexico once and for all.
    469 of 500 Signatures
    Created by Ann Rolfes
  • Candidates - state your position on Banning Ranch!
    At the October 7 California Coastal Commission (CCC) hearing in Long Beach, the CCC staff recommended that the commissioners deny the Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for the proposed massive Banning Ranch development project. The CCC staff’s recommendation was based on the developer's proposed project heavily impacting the extensive Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHAs), wetlands and Native American evidence on Banning Ranch, as well as other significant Coastal Act inconsistencies, In their report, the CCC staff described how, by reducing the development footprint to 11.5 acres, the developers could build a project that would be consistent with the Coastal Act. The CCC staff report from the October hearing can be viewed at: http://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2015/10/w9b-10-2015.pdf Rather than deny the development permit, the commissioners voted in October to postpone their decision and directed the developer and the CCC staff to work together to find a project that could be approved. In the months following the October hearing, the developer has submitted a reduced version of the proposed project that revised the development footprint from 124 acres to 85 acres. This revision seems more designed to secure a vote of a majority of the commissioners rather than a genuine attempt to bring the project into compliance with the Coastal Act. This proposed project still has nearly 900 homes, requires extensive grading (2.8 million cubic yards), and continues to result in significant impacts to ESHAs, wetlands and Native American evidence, and for these reasons, the Banning Ranch Conservancy opposes the developer's revised proposed project. The project was scheduled for a vote in May (ultimately postponed at the developer's request). For the May hearing, the CCC staff prepared a report in which CCC staff reclassified some areas of ESHA as non-ESHA, significantly expanding the potential development footprint from 11.5 acres to 55 acres and recommended approval of the developer's proposed project as long as the approval was conditioned such that the project would fit into the 55-acre footprint identified by CCC staff. The Banning Ranch Conservancy has strong objections to the CCC staff's reclassification of ESHA as non-ESHA and for this reason, we remain opposed to the proposed project, even with CCC staff's recommendations.
    105 of 200 Signatures
    Created by C Black
  • SWFL Clean Water Movement
    The SWFL Clean Water Movement is a group of concerned citizens rallying to end the toxic Lake Okeechobee discharges that destroy our river, esturay, and local Gulf waters. Freshwater releases from Lake Okeechobee pose major problems for our Southwest Florida ecosystem. As a result, incidents of dead oyster beds, wilted sea grasses, toxic algae blooms, and fish kills have increased in our coastal estuaries and rivers. We demand that our elected officials, legislators, and the corporate businesses responsible for this disaster support the solution: Buy the land and send the water south!
    4,630 of 5,000 Signatures
    Created by John Schierman
  • We request the EPA and US Army Corps of Engineers deny the wetlands permit requested by THD
    We hereby request the EPA and the Army Corps protect the remaining wetlands in Mountain Village by denying the wetlands permit requested by Telluride Hospital District.
    16 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Suse Connolly
  • Protect CA Coasts: Ban Offshore Fracking
    Federal agencies have lifted the moratorium on offshore fracking in the Santa Barbara Channel, and they've approved a permit to frack off the coast of Ventura. We saw how fracking and extreme extraction can destroy coastal communities after 140,000 gallons of crude oil spilled from a ruptured offshore rig off the coast of Santa Barbara last year. We cannot allow any more disasters to harm our communities! Ask Senators Boxer and Feinstein to write a letter to the Obama administration calling for a ban on offshore fracking in California.
    562 of 600 Signatures
    Created by Sarah Alexander Picture
  • Mayor Gimenez: Stop Spraying Panic!
    Getting infected by Zika is scary, especially for pregnant women. But, it's even scarier that our Mayor thinks the best way to protect us is by spraying Naled, a pesticide that was banned in the European Union for its harmful effects on wildlife and which raises serious concern about its effects on people after long exposures. According to the Miami Herald, "at larger doses, Naled’s effects on people range from headaches, nausea and diarrhea to death. The insecticide, which can penetrate skin but is most harmful when breathed in, attacks the human nervous system with the potency of a chemical weapon, scientists say. Accidental exposure has led to deaths in India and other countries." (Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/health-care/article95158007.html#storylink=cpy) Why would Gimenez make such an irresponsible decision? Was it because the panic about Zika could've affected his re-election? Well, Mayor Gimenez, now we don't know what is worse: the Zika virus or your solution. Stop spending our resources to create even more panic, harm our wildlife and expose our bodies to toxic pesticides.
    223 of 300 Signatures
    Created by Latina Comunica