I am a recpient of the ACA, and would like to know if it will be repealed or replaced.

Congressman Trey Gowdy has established himself within the Republican Congress and amongst Republicans at large as the "Uncoverer of Truth" and "Deliverer of Justice". It is now incumbent upon him to carry this non-partisan torch to seek and deliver any/all necessary justice and accountability from this administration as it relates to matters regarding Russia and the best interests of The United States of America, just as he did as the Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi.

Our representatives are required to hear our concerns, answer our questions, and represent our interests. We have repeatedly and respectfully asked for this meeting and our requests are being ignored or denied. We sign to jointly request a meeting with Rep. Walberg during this time intended to be devoted to meetings with the constituents of his district.

I've contacted Grothman numerous times regarding my concerns and have received nothing but unresponsive form letters. His public statements regarding his desire to create "government fit for a moral and religious people” concerns me that he doesn't understand the concept of separating church and state and that he doesn't represent all of us. I'd like him to answer my questions on this and many other topics.

An ongoing lie, or delusion, of the president of the United States affects not only me, but every US Citizen. This particular lie constitutes a "big lie." According to Joseph Goebblels “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it". For the sake of our democracy we cannot afford to allow Trump and his followers to perpetuate this big lie.

The subject of this petition is to determine if the present administration intended to undermine the then existing president of the United States and to also unearth ties to Russia which may link President Trump and members of his staff to the manipulation and/or rigging of the 2016 US election.

That we do not put are Country into the hands of someone who is unstable. To make sure that they are able to handle all that is required of them Mentally.

Senators are elected to serve the needs of the residents of their state and should therefore avail themselves to the general public whenever they return from Washington D.C. According to their official websites, neither Senator has any public events currently scheduled during the upcoming recess. As an Arkansas resident and voter, I find this lack of interaction with their constituents to be unacceptable.

Hundreds of his constituents have tried to get a meeting at his offices. He never shows up. He is avoiding hearing our concerns. He works for us. We want a town hall.

UPDATE: GREAT NEWS! Less than 24 hours after our petition launch and accompanying tweetstorm at the Oversight Committee handle, @OversightGOP, Chairman Chaffetz, announced that he would be probing security protocols at Mar-a-Lago security. A side-by-side comparison of the questions we requested be addressed and the Oversight Committee letter to Trump Chief of Staff Reince Preibus can be found at https://twitter.com/WomensAction/status/831644897614688256. We have to continue to hold Chairman Chaffetz's feet to the fire and ensure that the answers he gets on this subject are satisfactory. Our national security is at stake! Moreover, we must demand that Chaffetz does his job in all respects to hold the administration accountable. You'll be hearing from WAND soon to learn more about what we're doing to keep an eye on all matters of national security. ----- We demand that Jason Chaffettz immediately open an investigation into President Trump's handling of sensitive national security information -- particularly information related to North Korea's nuclear weapons and missile program and U.S. nuclear weapons -- while at his private club Mar-a-Lago on February 11, 2017. We encourage asking the following questions: Why wasn't the President moved to a secure location when responding to the North Korea ballistic missile launch? Is the Mar-a-Lago dining area considered a secure location? Is there a secure location at Mar-a-Lago? Was classified information discussed or viewed by the President in an unsecured location at Mar-a-Lago? Who thought it was appropriate to conduct national security business in front of Mar-a-Lago club members? How many people were near the President during the deliberations on North Korea's missile test? How many of them had cameras? Were there any unsecured smartphones around the table? If so, were the proper precautions taken to turn them off or move them away before sensitive national security discussions began? How many Mar-a-Lago club members were taking pictures? How many of those cameras have been checked by officials to ensure that no classified information was compromised? Has any classified information been compromised? Were the cell phones government issued or private property? How does one become a Mar-a-Lago member? Is there a requirement beyond paying the $200,000 member fee? If one joins Mar-a-Lago, can that person gain access to critical national security decision-making? Could any of the club members be agents of Russia or China or any other adversary? Do any of the Mar-a-Lago members have security clearances? Is there a protocol for Mar-a-Lago members to post photos on social media sites while dining with the President?

Senator Rubio has been absent from Jacksonville for quite a while. We demand that he appears in front of his constituents and address the issue of the repeal of the ACA (Obama Care ) and his plan (no plan so far ) to replace it with a viable and affordable one.

We believe democracy demands that every vote should matter equally and the president should be the one who wins the most votes. Neither was true in the past election, the second time in the last five elections. Under the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes, voters in Connecticut and other reliably blue or red states are ignored. Of nearly 400 events during the 2016 general election, 94% were in held in just 12 battleground states, only one was held in Connecticut. The NPV Compact is an agreement among states to award their electoral college votes to the winner of the national popular vote. Once states holding 270 electoral votes join, the Compact will go into effect, making the national popular vote winner the president. Ten states and the District of Columbia, representing 165 electoral votes, have joined the Compact over the past 10 years. The Compact does not abolish the Electoral College. It works within the framework of the Constitution, which gives the states the power to appoint Electors, “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” Support for the Compact is bipartisan. Newt Gingrich wrote, “This important project has the potential to transform the way we elect our presidents and to make sure all Americans have a voice in their future." During President Trump’s first week in office the Wall Street Journal reported that he “told Congressional leaders that he was interested in getting rid of the Electoral College and replacing it with a national popular vote.” The measure is not new; it passed the CT House in 2009 and has received bipartisan joint favorable votes in the General Administration and Elections Committee in 2011, 2013 and 2014. NPV legislation is currently under consideration in 19 states, many of them red. Please make Connecticut’s votes matter by supporting the NPV Compact.