-
Mayor Schaaff: No new fossil fuel infrastructure in Oakland, CAThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment, and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of west coast ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the threat posed to the people of Oakland by fossil fuels being shipped via rail, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure in the City of Oakland.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Mayor Stromberg: No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in Ashland, ORThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment, and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of west coast ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the threat posed to the people of Ashland and to our global environment by fossil fuels, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Mayor Kujala: No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in Warrenton, ORThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment, and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of west coast ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the threat posed to the people of Warrenton by a proposed LNG terminal and to our global environment, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Mayor Condon: No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in Spokane, WAThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment, and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of west coast ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines, and much of it comes through Spokane. Given the urgency of the threat posed to Spokane residents and to our global environment, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure.6 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Mayor Strickland: No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in TacomaThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment, and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of Northwest ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the threat posed to the people of Tacoma and to our global environment, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure in your jurisdiction.10 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Mayor Garcetti: No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in Los Angeles, CAThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment, and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of west coast ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the threat posed to people in Los Angeles by existing fossil fuel infrastructure, where leaks and spills are too common, and the risk to our global environment, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure in Los Angeles.3 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Mayor Butt: No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in Richmond, CAThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment and threaten the livability of their communities. If allowed, coal, oil and gas carried out of west coast ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the public health and environmental threat posed to Richmond residents by existing fossil fuel infrastructure, and to our global environment by climate change, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure in your jurisdiction.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Mayor Lee: No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in San FranciscoThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects through the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of Northwest ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the threat posed to San Francisco and to our global environment, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Mayor Murray: No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in SeattleThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of Northwest ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the threat posed to Seattle and to our global environment, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure.10 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Help those in need of better housing opportunitiesWe are currently enrolled in, Race and Ethnic Relations, taught by Professor Paul Lopez, at California State University, Chico158 of 200 SignaturesCreated by Jenalle Devine
-
Mayor Murray: No New Fossil Fuel Infastructure in SeattleThe rapid development of fossil fuel resources in the western U.S. and Canada has resulted in numerous proposed fossil fuel infrastructure projects up and down the West Coast. These fossil fuel infrastructure projects pose significant risks to the health and safety of people and their environment and threaten the livability of their communities. Coal, oil and gas carried out of Northwest ports would carry as much carbon annually as five Keystone XL pipelines. Given the urgency of the threat posed to Seattle and to our global environment, we urge you to act on this issue now by pledging to build no new fossil fuel infrastructure.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Daphne Wysham
-
Help keep my German Shepherds safe!Because I live on a corner, I am subjected to foot traffic on three sides of my home. The neighborhood in which I live has many families living in single-family homes. They allow their pets to roam off-leash and some keep their pet in their front yard which faces my back yard. Neighbor's cats wander the streets constantly. My dogs are my life. Not having sufficient barrier between us and constant traffic is a major concern. I believe I have the right to keep myself and my pets as safe as other homes who do not live on a corner. In fact, I would say that I deserve more protection because I do live on a corner.699 of 800 SignaturesCreated by Amber Marks