While sales continue, Caltrans is still able to proceed with suspicious pricing, aggressive contract negotiations, and a myriad of building code and health and safety code violations. Without intervention, these serious problems will be inherited by disadvantaged home buyers, and the costs and risks ultimately transferred to the cities and districts in which these homes are located.  Caltrans tenants feel that they are under duress. There is widespread confusion about the manner in which the law and the regulations are being applied by Caltrans and their real estate contractor, Veterans Realty Group. There is a lack of uniform, accurate information, and an immediate need for advocacy and legal aid. 

It protects children from harm and unnecessary separation Children need safety—but they also need love, stability, and connection to their family. When kids are removed without clear danger or placed with strangers instead of relatives, it can cause emotional trauma. This act makes sure removal only happens when truly necessary. 👨‍👩‍👧 It keeps families together when it’s safe By requiring kinship placement first, the act helps children stay with grandparents, aunts, uncles, or close family friends instead of entering foster care with strangers. That means less trauma and stronger emotional support. ⚖️ It gives parents basic fairness and rights Many parents feel shut out of the process. This act ensures they: • Know what they’re being accused of • Can see the evidence • Can attend hearings and defend themselves That’s not extra—it’s basic due process. 🎥 It brings transparency to the system With recordings and documentation, there is: • Less room for false claims or misunderstandings • More accountability for caseworkers • Clear evidence for courts When systems are transparent, they are more fair. 🏠 It makes foster care safer Not every foster placement is equal. This act strengthens: • Background checks • Drug screening • Mental health evaluations • Ongoing monitoring So children are placed in safe, stable homes. 🩺 It prevents unqualified decisions about children Decisions about a child’s mental or physical health can shape their entire future. This act ensures only licensed professionals can make those calls—protecting children from harmful or incorrect evaluations. 🔍 It holds the system accountable Without oversight, mistakes can go unchecked. This act creates independent review, so: • Complaints are investigated • Wrong decisions can be corrected • Families have a voice ❤️ It restores trust Right now, many families don’t trust the system meant to help them. This act sends a message: “The system should protect children and respect families—not work against them.”

AI systems are already shaping how youth think, feel, and cope. Without regulation, they can contribute to anxiety, depression, addictive behaviors, and harmful advice. Leading health organizations warn that AI can negatively influence adolescent wellbeing without proper oversight, and research highlights the rapid rise in youth reliance on these tools. The Legislature acknowledges that algorithmic systems and (AI)-powered platforms  are increasingly influencing young people's online experiences, which can have a harmful effect on their mental health by contributing to anxiety and depression, which can result in addictive behaviors and suicidal thoughts. In order to prevent technology developments from jeopardizing the growth and safety of California's youth, this bill aims to strike a balance between these systems' ability and accountability. By addressing the increasing influence AI and digital technologies have on young people's mental health development, lawmakers seek to pass legislation to safeguard children's and adolescents' safety, wellbeing, and mental health in California. Add your name to the petition NOW!  References 1.  https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB1181/id/3367420 2. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB1181#99INT 3. https://www.apa.org/topics/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning/health-advisory-ai-adolescent-well-being  4. https://www.apa.org/topics/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning/health-advisory-ai-adolescent-well-being  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12621494/ (Adolescent Health and Generative AI—Risks and Benefits) 6. Revolutionizing Youth Mental Health with Ethical AI 7. AI and mental health: emerging clinical considerations  8. https://www.michiganmedicine.org/health-lab/more-teens-are-using-ai-what-parents-should-know  9. You, Daniel. “AI and Mental Health: Emerging Clinical Considerations.” Australasian Psychiatry : Bulletin of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists [England], February 2026, p. 10398562261423840, https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562261423840. 10. https://jedfoundation.org/artificial-intelligence-youth-mental-health-pov/ 

• Community Image: A town name should represent pride, not punchlines. • Economic Growth: First impressions matter for tourism, business investment, and branding. • Modern Relevance: Language shifts over time; names should evolve with it. • Local Voice: Residents deserve a say in how their town is represented.

I will solicit signatures from every person who pays this company

People should join this movement because it offers something Indianapolis is missing: a real, practical, humane path forward. This campaign isn’t about blame or politics — it’s about building a city where everyone has the chance to be safe, stable, and part of the community. This is a great opportunity to build stronger neighborhoods. Community gardens, greenhouse projects, beautification work, and small‑business partnerships all create:  • cleaner streets  • safer parks  • more local pride  • stronger relationships between neighbors  Not everyone can donate money or volunteer every week.  But everyone can:  • sign a petition  • share information  • support fair‑wage programs  • advocate for humane policies 

The district Camp Chloe resides in, is currently overseen by councilman Mark Squilla, who has maintained councilmanic prerogative to the detriment of the residents. Meaning, he will continually back property owners, shareholders and developers needs over the needs of a vulnerable community of his constituents.  When asked to stop the most recent sweep, Mark Squilla told organizers that 'he doesn't have councilmanic prerogative over this land' which is absolutely not true. He has not been available for further comment, though the sweep was deterred by on the ground efforts of supporters and organizers.    Cherelle Parker has not made any comment about Camp Chloe, but we have heard from her office, that the needs and demands of the residents have been 'noted'.  As of 3/23, Cherelle Parker and Mark Squilla held a press conference announcing a new shelter opening up in the city, calling it a 'solution, not a shelter'.  But a solution for whom?  Funding for housing has been cut across the country. Abandoned houses rot throughout Philadelphia, seldom being repurposed into affordable housing. Rent is skyrocketing. Federal funding for social security, food stamps, and general assistance is being cut.  When this happens, the homeless population grows. Is the Mayor suggesting, with Mark Squilla standing directly behind her, that the 'solution' to losing your house, is to be indefinitely admitted into a shelter?  Is the suggestion that shelters offer more stability? Instead of curbing autonomy as we know them to do?  It is odd to offer shelters as a 'solution', to 'solve homelessness', in a city where the amount of vacant houses more than TRIPLES the amount of residents it has experiencing homelessness.  Without investing in more permanent, supportive housing, WHEN are you supposed to leave the shelter? WHERE are you supposed to go once you're out if there's no voucher and you can't afford rent? Philadelphia has more expensive transportation, groceries, and utilities than the national average. HOW are shelter systems helping offset these expenses for individuals who hope to graduate from them? HOW can one meaningfully save for an affordable future when the funding is only being spent on interim shelters?  Now you're starting to see what the residents of Camp Chloe have seen for a long time.  We demand a stop to the forced removal of the residents of Camp Chloe.  We demand negotiations instead of coercion into shelters. 

WCMC actively supports Alabama's abortion ban — with no exceptions for rape or incest. This ban carries penalties of up to 99 years in prison for providers and has created a documented crisis in all pregnancy-related care. Doctors across Alabama are delaying or denying standard miscarriage treatment for fear of prosecution, since miscarriage and abortion are often clinically indistinguishable. Alabama already has the third-highest maternal mortality rate in the nation. Nearly half of all pregnancy-related criminal prosecutions in the U.S. in the first year after Dobbs came from Alabama alone. WCMC is a Crisis Pregnancy Center (CPC). WCMC is not a neutral healthcare resource. It is a pro-life advocacy organization operating under the guise of medical care. Sponsoring their public events is not a charitable act — it is a medical ethics issue.     Women's Care Medical Center presents itself as a pregnancy resource clinic. What it actually operates as is what medical and public health professionals describe as a "crisis pregnancy center" (CPC) — a category of facility specifically designed to intercept people facing unplanned pregnancies and steer them away from abortion, and often away from contraception, using tactics that medical authorities have repeatedly condemned as deceptive and harmful.   The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) — the foremost authority governing the specialty practiced at your clinic — has formally identified CPCs as institutions that "use deception, delay tactics, and disinformation," undermining "the tenets of informed consent and patient autonomy." According to ACOG's data, 71% of CPCs use deceptive means. WCMC runs an abstinence-only program targeting Baldwin County students. Under the name "Optimal Truth of WCMC" (baldwincountysra.org), WCMC operates a federally-defined "Sexual Risk Avoidance" program — abstinence-only education rebranded — aimed at middle and high schoolers across all Baldwin County public schools. Part of the curriculum is to burn paper hearts in the classroom, telling students that they "will never be whole again" if they have sex before marriage and that contraception isn't safe. Alabama's own public health data shows this approach is failing: the state has the 5th-highest teen birth rate in the nation and ranks 7th in overall STD rates, 4th in gonorrhea. Federal investigations have found that over 80% of abstinence-only curricula contain false or misleading information about reproductive health. The downstream consequences walk into your exam rooms every day. We are not asking you to take a political position. We are asking you to uphold your medical ones. Sponsoring WCMC's March for Life is incompatible with the ethics of your specialty, the standards of ACOG, and the trust your patients have placed in you. Withdraw your sponsorship. Stand with your patients. Signed, the undersigned current patients of Fairhope Gynecology & Obstetrics Sources: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG); AMA Journal of Ethics; National Library of Medicine / PMC; CDC; Alabama Department of Public Health; ACLU of Alabama; Yellowhammer Fund; Birmingham Free Press; World Population Review; Alabama Reflector; Pregnancy Justice; and WCMC's own public websites including womenscaremedicalcenter.org and baldwincountysra.org.

CONTINUATION OF SECTION 3 above Section 3.3: Executive Branch * If the people of the United States, after a Senate impeachment trial, convict and remove a member of the executive branch, in a national election. Vacancy shall be filled in accordance with this Constitution and statute.  * If the people initiate a recall election of the executive branch, the President and the Vice-President shall be recalled at the same time in a national election.  • Congress shall engage and compensate the International IDEA, OSCE, or UN to oversee the recall and replacement elections of both MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH by the people of the United States.  • The first national special election shall determine whether to recall the executive branch. AFTER ten of the twenty States with a recall process have satisfied the quorum to recall the executive branch of the federal government.  • If the EXECUTIVE BRANCH is removed from office by a recall election,  • The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on Thursday, within 48 hours of election day. • The Congress may choose an interim temporary executive branch according to the Constitution. • A second consecutive special election shall take place to elect a NEW EXECUTIVE BRANCH of the federal government. A majority vote of the people within each State and at least twenty-five of the fifty States shall be necessary during a special, midterm, or presidential election. LIST OF GRIEVANCES _________President Donald J. Trump_____________ has committed many of the Tyrannic actions performed by the King of Great Britain and listed in our Declaration of Independence and more. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.  • The law, 18 USC § 208, which exempts the President/Vice President, encourages corruption and contradicts Amendment Article XIV of the Constitution, equal protection of the law.     WHY WE NEED TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION NOW. The branches of the federal government (the legislative, executive, and judicial) are abdicating their Constitutional duties, checks and balances, and making decisions based on partisanship, allowing violations of the Constitution with no consequences.  • The Supreme Court on July 1, 2024, ruled that former President Trump is at least presumptively immune from criminal liability for his official acts. However, our Constitution clearly states that NO ONE is above the law, definitely those who have taken “an oath.” • The United States Senate’s impeachment trials (Article I, Section 3) provide evidence that the Constitution has been violated by members of Congress, the executive, and judicial branches (Article I, Section 9; Article II, Section 4;  Article VI); however, no one has been convicted or removed due to partisanship. OUR FOUNDING FATHERS: Our Declaration of Independence states, whenever any form of government becomes destructive, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. • George Washington's Farewell Address warns against hyper-partisanship and factions, and stresses adherence to the Constitution and public virtue. He advised leaders to serve the common good and respect governmental checks and balances. • Alexander Hamilton was concerned that an “unprincipled” man would “mount the hobby horse of popularity” and “throw things into confusion. In a government like ours.” He would write, “No one is above the law.” In 2025, George Washington and Alexander Hamilton’s concerns have come to pass with Trump. It would be naïve to think Trump’s cronies and the younger generations watching federal officials will stop trying to silence journalists, threatening physical harm to political opponents, and denying Citizens' right to earn a livelihood. HOW TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION NOW? HOW. WE THE PEOPLE URGE that two-thirds of both Houses of Congress vote in favor and propose to the States an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Then, WE THE PEOPLE URGE that the Legislatures of three-fourths of the several States ratify the amendment (Article V). THE ALTERNATIVE IS TO ELECT ACCOUNTABLE REPRESENTATIVES. • Article I states, “the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”  • Article X states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” We have the technology and the processes, which were not available when the Constitution was originally ratified in a convention on September 17, 1789. • TECHNOLOGY. In 1982, without the internet, Gregory Watson, a 19-year-old college sophomore, initiated a long-term campaign for Amendment 27, which was proposed in 1789 as part of the original Bill of Rights and finally ratified on May 7, 1992.  • RECALL PROCESS. 20 States (AZ, CA, CO, MI, NV, ND, WI, AK, GA, ID, IL, KS, LA, MN, MT, NJ, OR, RI, WA, VA) have recall elections, allowing citizens to attempt to remove from office elected State officials.

Others should join this campaign for change because creating an inclusive and accepting school environment benefits everyone—not just LGBT+ students or those who express themselves differently. When all students feel safe and respected, it leads to better mental health, increased academic achievement, and a stronger sense of community. Discrimination and exclusion harm the entire school culture by fostering fear, division, and missed opportunities for understanding. By standing up for fairness and dignity, supporters can help ensure that schools are places where every child has the opportunity to thrive without fear of bullying or judgment. This campaign is about affirming basic human rights and modeling kindness, empathy, and respect for future generations. Joining together amplifies our voices and demonstrates a united commitment to building a better, more equitable educational environment for all.

Food insecurity is important because it can affect a vast majority of students. The vast majority can begin to suffer academically, creating a cycle of issues for the institution and the individual. With your help, we can take measures to resolve this issue and ensure that all students, regardless of their circumstances, can prosper.

Human rights is a cornerstone of our democracy.  It's unconscionable that these conditions exist in our country today.  State inflicted inhumanity can not be tolerated.  Men, women and children are suffering these conditions today.  There's no time to wait.