I believe our community needs to be aware of the choice our city has decided on and I believe the community should have a voice in what happens to these animals! I think we can all agree euthanizing the wildlife should be at the bottom of the list for possible options.

Donald Trump's hateful rhetoric and exclusionary policy proposals are divisive and dangerous. Despite professed disagreement with his abhorrent views and statements, two of American golf's leading bodies have continued doing business with him, and as such, they reward him materially and give him and his views undeserved legitimacy.

As a CT citizen and ratepayer, I am angry that my money is being used to hijack CT global warming mitigation and renewable energy efforts and underwrite, at the same time, fracking to the west of us. I also worry about the waste water from the fracking fields that will be seeking a home here unless the fracking is stopped.

Fairness and to prove out neutrality in governmental investigations. Rid our country of double standards.

After years of behind-the-scenes negotiations, it's now up to Congress to decide whether or not we join the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a multinational trade treaty with disastrous implications for the American people. The TPP would devastate our economy. It would expand our trade deficit, drive down wages for American workers, and worsen income inequality. Under the TPP, big corporations would be incentivized to move our jobs overseas, leaving our working families struggling to make ends meet. The TPP threatens not only our economy, but also our health and safety. It would erode critical environmental and consumer protections, including our food safety standards, and would allow pharmaceutical companies to over-charge for life-saving medicines. The American people deserve better. We call on Congress to strengthen consumer protections, combat the threat of climate change, and create an economy that works for working families — and that means voting "No" on the TPP.

Why term limit the mayor? Chicago is the only city among the nation’s ten largest without mayoral term limits. Presidents are term limited; mayors of 20 Illinois communities, too. Incumbent Chicago mayors outspend challengers by huge margins thanks to millionaire pals and lobbyists with clout. The only way to oust the wealthy insiders at City Hall is through this binding referendum. The elected Consumer Advocate is similar to New York City’s Public Advocate, a post (once held by Mark Green and Bill de Blasio) which fights for the vulnerable. The Chicago Consumer Advocate will be a champion for tenants, working moms, cable users, safe drinking water, minimum wage, CTA riders, fair taxes, and foster kids, for example. We need 100,000 in-person signatures of registered Chicago voters to put this on the ballot. Then, if a majority say “Yes” to the two questions, both would be effective in time for the 2019 election. The current mayor would be ineligible to run in 2019. Petitions and referendums work. I’ve used these tools of change to cut the size of the Illinois House by a third, and help create the Citizens Utility Board, Illinois’ largest consumer group. Way back in 1976, I led a petition drive (635,158 signatures!) which ended the 100-year-old practice of Illinois legislators taking their entire annual salary on the first day in office. Grassroots petition drives led by everyday people make reform possible! Help us get 100,000 in-person signatures for the Take Charge Chicago petition drive by adding your name and signing up to volunteer today. I’ve said there are two types of people in life: the movers and shakers, and those who are moved and shaken. MoveOn.org activists are movers and shakers: Let’s open up City Hall and let the people in! Note: The Take Charge Chicago drive is not an online signature process. Learn more at TakeChargeChicago.org and download a copy of the official petition to circulate.

A moratorium or ban on vacation rentals is NOT the best way to address vacation rental concerns. Concerns over noise and occupancy violations continue in our city, and we look to our City Council to be a leader in creating positive solutions to enhance residents lives. We are pleading with the City Council to not cause damage to the value of our homes, or the growth of our businesses. A ban will cause a drop in demand for homes here, and confusion in our local real estate market. Less demand will cause a drop in home values, weakening our local economy. A weaker economy will affect nearly all residents, not just vacation rental owners and management companies. Catering companies, restaurants, contractors, landscape and pool maintenance companies and many others will be especially at risk. Residents, business owners, employees and homeowners here want the City Council to help support the value of their homes, not harm it. Several ideas worth investigating, to help implement better enforcement, could include: 1. Implementing electronic signature technology to make renters aware of existing strict noise and occupancy restrictions BEFORE they rent, especially for properties not managed by local property management firms that already institute similar disclosures. Suggest the requirement to use a standardized form for ALL vacation rental homeowners. 2. Stronger commitment for fines for renters that violate the existing ordinance. This puts the responsibility back on a renter choosing to violate the existing city ordinance. Instead of considering $1,000 fines for homeowners that decide to violate a so-called moratorium (which is what the current moratorium suggests), renters should be held financially responsible for their behavior. In conjunction with the aforementioned electronic signature process, it would seem the technology exists that tenants would be required to leave their credit card info, at the time of booking, knowing UP FRONT it could be used in the event of a violation of the local ordinance the city needs to articulate it takes very seriously. This seems FAR LESS complicated than some of the elaborate and complicated solutions being discussed that include somehow devising a plan to determine density requirements or limiting ownership of rentals to one rental per person. Palm Springs is a city based on tourism. We are not like almost all of the other cities that have banned vacation rentals. Most of those cities have well rounded economies based on many different industries. A change in policy for a city like that will not likely have disastrous effects. Palm Springs is different. We don't have anything else to fall back on. Even the city of Santa Fe, New Mexico recently reversed its limit on the number of vacation rental permits, after acknowledging it was difficult to manage violations and that the policy was damaging their economy and financial well being. Vacation renters regularly rate the quality of their stay in Palm Springs among the Top 5 or Top 10 in the entire country. Certainly the City Council wishes to retain such a distinguished rating? We urge the City Council to not ban vacation rentals, but to get serious about continuing to implement better enforcement to help neighborhoods become more peaceful again. Many full time and part time residents alike look to your leadership to help keep the city from experiencing an economic shock that will be difficult to recover from. In the short term, real estate agents are reporting cancelled escrows, as well as angry buyers that recently purchased into our community, that are suddenly faced with the prospect that their home can no longer be used for the purpose they intended. Certainly there is a better way? We urge the City Council to get serious about enforcement, but to save residents home values by voting NO to any current or future moratorium or ban on short term rentals.

One-sided committees can be devastating and should not be allowed under any circumstances.

I am tired of a do nothing congress getting benefits that most of us could only dream about, then refusing to do the jobs they were elected to do. I think it is a shame that our political system, once lauded as the World's Greatest....has become a laughing stock. No wonder terrorists see us as weak, we won't even work together...and the blame falls squarely at the feet of the obstructionists...NO WORK = NO PAY

I want my brother's case reviewed and my brother, Michael S. Hunter, pardoned and released.

We, the residents of Wesley Hills, are aggravated and concerned with the proposed Crown Castle DAS node installations, which we see as problematic on numerous levels.

Support out leaders.