I have 2 windshields that need to be replaced due to cracking, and my full coverage insurance in the state of Colorado does not cover glass replacement. There are currently 12 states who have the no fault law in place to keep drivers safe on the roads, but Colorado is not one of them and should be, because we live in the mountains and having cracked auto glass is simply just not safe. Your windshield, paired up with your seat belt and your air bags, are all designed to keep you in your car. When the integrity of your windshield has been compromised, your safety and the safety of your passengers are at risk. Your passenger side air bag uses your windshield as a back board; if it ever deploys, it hits the windshield first before it can go forward. If you have a damaged or brittle windshield, that same air bag will shatter your glass and, if it is very old, it can pop it clean out. The safety standards of your windshield only applies to new glass, not damaged and brittle glass. Once you pick up a chip, anything that is within 6 inches of the frame, no matter what, will eventually crack. Because it is a major stress point in your windshield, any temperature change or shift ( like turning a corner) can and will cause that glass to crack. Once the chip happens, it breaks down the laminate that holds the two pieces of glass together and makes the entire windshield brittle, thus causing more chips and the ultimate result: a CRACK. Ninety percent of drivers in Colorado are driving around with some type of damage to their windshield, with no auto glass coverage except chip repair. A chip repair is only a band aid because the glass will continue to dry out even with a repair. Sand pitting is another form of damage that is very dangerous, because it limits your ability to see through your windshield as you drive towards the sun or at night, when oncoming traffic headlights hit your windshield. The glare alone can cause accidents! We need auto glass covered under our full coverage and liability with comprehensive policies so that drivers can replace their auto glass at no cost with no deductible. It is, in fact, no fault damage, and with no fault insurance coverage, no insurance company can legally raise your rates due to no fault damage. Let's stand together to pass this law. Our roads are horrible and our insurance is far from adequate concerning this issue.

Apple censors art and books? They're so big they intimidate online news services who refuse to send out press releases regarding banned book. Apple can choose to sell what it wants in its own store but they should be made aware that many Americans don't approve of prudish PC behavior.

Protecting small farms in Michigan should be a top priority. Many farmers' markets are a consortium of small farms producing local produce. This is a vital part of local economies in many areas in Michigan and around the country. Michigan lawmakers should support the rights of individuals, not just the interest of big business.

Hobby beekeepers in the suburbs and urban areas keep Michigan in the race to save the honey bee. Small Michigan farmers provide us healthy foods that include fresh eggs and honey products in urban farmers markets.

My kids' father was set up by a family member/dealer. They sat at the dealers house, got high. Before my fiance left there,the dealer gave him a bowl to go in piece of paper that paper had 2 names written down that they both knew. He left there and was followed pulled over searched had thrown it when they first started search. In cuffs for drinking & Driving,they continued searching the car and proceed to search for that piece of paper because they knew what they were looking for.

This is the most effective way to raise the minimum wage. By pledging to vote in upcoming elections in 2014 for candidates who support this progressive strategy to empower American workers, the possibility of passing an increase in the minimum wage is increased. Less people will be dependent on subsidy programs if the minimum wage is increased, plus the increase will begin to solve the inequality problem in the United States.

I am not disturbed by the additional $112 in taxes/year; as a public servant I believe we should all be good stewards of the public's funds and facilities. This $2,000,000 in bond funding is not the best use of public funds when alternatives presented demonstrated a fully functional and safe environment for a fraction of the cost and without a need for a Bond tax measure.

Brother Dean is a menace to University of Arizona campus. Hopefully this petition can reveal the student body opinion on the question on every ones mind. Should Brother Dean be allowed on the University of Arizona property? As a senior graduating from the U of A it saddens me to think that future generations of Wildcats may have to endure his messages of hate. He does not exercise the right to free speech he abuses it, spewing out messages of how women deserve rape, or gays deserve hell. Brother Dean does not bring any benefits to the school nor does he contribute to building of a positive environment for development and higher learning. He should be brought up on disciplinary charges for his blatant disregard for the University's own code of conduct. To site statute 21, " Engaging in discriminatory activities, including harassment and retaliation, as prohibited by applicable law or university policy. " He violates this rule every time he takes to the mall to speak. I know that I am fed up with his behavior and would like to see a campus free of Brother Dean. To be clear my message is not speaking to infringe upon his right to speech or freedom of religious practices. I am only saying that what he is doing has no place on a college campus.

Did you know that every day vulnerable children slip through the safety net that’s supposed to catch them? Keisha entered the child welfare system as an infant and bounced around foster families for years. At 12 years old, she was raped and forced into prostitution. At age 17, Keisha was arrested, detained, and labeled a juvenile delinquent (1). Keisha is not a criminal. She is a victim of human trafficking. The child welfare system should have identified her before law enforcement sent her to jail. Due to severe lack of capacity and training, the social workers in charge of her well-being failed to intervene. The system that was supposed to protect her left her traumatized instead. Keisha is not alone. There’s substantial evidence that child trafficking victims usually have involvement with the child welfare system either before or during their exploitation (2). In Maryland, nearly 30% of cases referencing human trafficking involve minors (3). Child welfare agencies across the country are not identifying or providing for the needs of children - some already within their systems - that are vulnerable to sex and labor trafficking. You can change this reality. U.S. Senators are considering passing legislation to fix this injustice. But they need your help. Senator Mikulski can help ensure that child welfare agencies take action to protect these children. The child welfare bill will improve child welfare agencies’ ability to identify and protect more vulnerable children. That’s why we need Senator Mikulski to support the Strengthening the Child Welfare Response to Human Trafficking Act of 2013 (S.1823). Sources: 1. Ima Matul, Child Welfare System Must Work Better to Help Stop Trafficking of Children | Commentary, ROLL CALL (Jan. 23, 2014), http://www.rollcall.com/news/child_welfare_system_must_work_better_to_help_stop_trafficking_of_children-230345-1.html?pg=1. 2. A New York State study showed that 85% of child trafficking victims had prior involvement with the child welfare system. Frances Gragg, Ian Petta, Haidee Bernstein, Karla Eisen, & Liz Quinn, New York Prevalence Study of Commercially Sexually Exploited Children, Prepared for: New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Apr. 18, 2007. 3. National Human Trafficking Resource Center (NHTRC) Data Breakdown, Maryland State Report 1/1/2013 – 12/31/2013, available at: https://na4.salesforce.com/sfc/p/300000006E4S/a/600000004UwS/OJQI0uqWB.DsXVTWOclL1ws2ZLst2DQ5ZtqZQkFq95Q=.

I am very much concerned about the treatment of disenfranchised members of my community.

I bought my condo in Bettendorf, Iowa, in 2007 and lived there ever since. What started out as an excitement of a new homeowner, gradually turned into a worst nightmare. As soon as the Board of Directors was formed (in 2008) they started their reign of terror by bullying owners into compliance with their unreasonable propositions, misinformation, micromanagement and redlining. One of the few very harmful amendments to the Association Bylaws was the BOD's orchestrating a ban on renting. The Board manipulated the owners into thinking that the value of their homes was going down due to renting (even though only a few condos out of over a hundred units were rented at the time). The real reason behind the ban: a large proportion of renters were families of color, mostly professionals from Asia. Condo owners' meetings usually resemble a coliseum-style intimidation of those who disagree with the BOD's decisions. In addition, I wonder if the ban on renting was even valid since there is no public record of the amendment. In any case, the Board stands by its decision to ban renting and those who have to relocate for any reason are in danger of having to foreclose their homes and face other hardships. However, when it comes to real issues, such as the maintenance, the owners are left to their own devices. This winter, for example, the driveways literally looked like a skating rink. I was one of the unfortunate owners who ended up with a back injury after falling on the ice. Instead of an apology, I was advised by a Board member to use a back door, where there was supposedly less ice! Palmer Hills Place BOD's terrorizing and their illegal, racist, harmful actions and neglect need to stop. They need to step down and let the well-intended and capable board members to take their place.

Education & proper treatment for a young boy with Aprexia & Autism