-
Mayor Bloomberg: It is time to have realtime bus schedules in NYCWaiting for buses on the q5 route is a real pain; they do not come often and when they do, they come bunched together. There is no accountability. I could find better use for my time and it would probably help the economy as most people would spend more time shopping. Geneva Switzerland is a good model if the MTA needs ideas.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Joseph Roland
-
Stop Brad Pitt's Ad for Perfume Sold at Macy'sMacy's continues to support brands promoted by Donald Trump who recklessly sent out tirades and untruths about President Barack Obama.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Linda Nelson
-
Stop Brad Pitt's Ad for Perfume Sold at Macy'sMacy's continues to support brands promoted by Donald Trump who recklessly sent out tirades and untruths about President Barack Obama.1 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Linda Nelson
-
Request to form a Deptartment of Firearm RegistrationConcern over the number of deaths due to firearms14 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Lemuel D Smith
-
Free our federal research organizations to study guns as they study disease and crime.Untie the hands of researchers or research funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Injury and the ATF so that we the people can see exactly what the possible causes to our country having so much gun violence. Is it proliferation of assault weapons? Are they most used in crimes? Is it really true that murderers without guns can kill as many people as murderers with guns? Much less assault guns? Our government should be protecting us, not prohibiting research that might lead to saner gun control.16 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Michael Case
-
Relief for Underwater Home ownersThis is a proposal to extend relief to homeowners with underwater loans that may otherwise be qualified to purchase a new or different home. This program would include a one time tax write off deductible over a ten year period, in equal portions per year for the sale of a single family primary residence. I have been stuck in a home far underwater for 7 years, but am otherwise qualified to purchase a different home if there were a way to write off the loss of the underwater amount in the event of a sale. This order is an affront to the banks and the Congress who have empowered the banks to write off ALL of their costs for homes they hold in inventory that were once the homes of families that have not been able to write off any portion of their losses. The banks have ALL of the benefits that should belong to the victims of the Housing bubble debacle, in that the families cannot get one penny of relief for their losses. This will get the real estate market going by unleashing market forces allowing bank held inventory to rapidly adjust to mark-to-market pricing instead of mark-to-prior-sale pricing. Real estate sales is a primary generator of economic strength and results in huge job creation. By unlocking the portion of the economy now being held by the Banks within the spread between their pricing and fair market pricing, billions of dollars will enter the economy and generate jobs. Congress is dysfunctionally unable to enact something similar because of politically sectarian gridlock. The Banks will never willingly mark-to-market because the ability to write off the artificially higher prices gives them a greater benefit than doing the right thing.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by John Baird
-
Require Liability Insurance on the Most Dangerous GunsAll gun owners claim that they are responsible, and all guns are initially purchased from manufacturers through legal means. Yet over 31 thousand people die in the US each year of gun-related injuries, and at least twice that many receive non-fatal injuries. In addition to the horror, pain and loss of loved ones, these incidents are estimated to generate over $100BN in economic damage each and every year. Given the difficulties of controlling firearms through regulatory means, it is unreasonable to assume that meaningful public policies aimed at reducing the risk posed to Americans by the 300 million-plus guns currently in circulation in the US will be successful. Other means must be considered. Liability insurance is one of the oldest and most well-instantiated means that society has of managing the risk that one person’s private property or behavior may pose to others, or to society at large. Most states, for example, recognize that motor vehicles have the potential to cause harm to others, and that many vehicle-owners do not have the financial means to reimburse others for damage caused by accidents, and therefore require it for use of public roads. It is also required for many kinds of commercial activity in which a mishap might harm innocent people – restaurants and other public accommodations, transportation services, industrial facilities are but a few examples in which liability insurance is used to ensure safety standards and manage risk. Banks generally require insurance in connection with mortgages and other financing activities. There are a number of discreet and compelling benefits to this system. The most obvious is that people who suffer harm can be made financially whole. But that is only the tip of the iceberg: another, perhaps more important, benefit is that insurance uses the marketplace to draw on a deep well of expertise to determine how risk accrues in a variety of situations. Unlike regulation, which is by its nature a one-size-fits-all mechanism, insurance is inherently adaptable – it harnesses the power and flexibility of the marketplace to assign the appropriate cost to a wide variety of risky situations. In addition, mandatory insurance is so widely applied, and so well-accepted, that it would be extremely difficult to make a 2nd Amendment argument against requiring it for many types of guns. Lastly, requiring insurance for the most dangerous guns would have the effect of enlisting the insurance industry into the public policy debates as a check against the lobbying power of the gun industry fighting firepower with fire, so to speak. Under this new approach, gun-owners would have a powerful economic incentive to maintain the highest standards of safety. Irresponsible gun owners would find it expensive – perhaps prohibitively so – to indulge in behaviors which create the potential for harm to others, while responsible ones would be rewarded with much lower rates. It would also help curb the toxic practice of ‘straw purchasing’, by imposing costs well in excess of the profits to such buyers, and by creating a paper trail which would make it easy to hold such criminals accountable. It would also provide a brake against the increasingly-common practice of people building private arsenals of high-powered weapons, since the carrying costs would be immense. This is not a perfect solution. But we believe that it is an artful and effective proposal which would, if nothing else, change the conversation around how to manage the tremendous risk posed to innocent people by those who fail to manage their weapons safely. Lastly, it has the advantage of having the potential to be implemented at the local level: just as local governments can set their own standards for liability insurance, so also could cities, counties and states create their own rules for insuring weapons.200 of 300 SignaturesCreated by Adam Caper
-
Not Profiting by WarOur legislators in Washington profit by wars while those called upon to fight these wars pay in blood or with their lives.3 of 100 SignaturesCreated by richard kuban
-
animal rights treatyThere should be a treaty requiring signatories to pass laws protecting animals.7 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Josh
-
Respect for our PresidentI am annoyed that a myraid of media outlets refer to our President as Mr. Obama! He is President Obama and in 4 years he will be Former President Obama. It is incredibly disrespectful for our media to ever refer to him as Mr. Obama! I've NEVER heard media outlets refer to ANY president as Mr. It is appalling!1 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Sue
-
Stop killing wolveswolves are far too important to become extinct11 of 100 SignaturesCreated by judith keeley
-
Bring back prayer in schoolsOur rights as Christians to have the freedom to pray where and when we want to. I see our Christian rights slowly being taken away from us while non Christians rights are being supported.3 of 100 SignaturesCreated by FRED & CONNIE WILLIAMS