I am a Maine Indigenous woman from the Penobscot Tribe. I want to make the state a place that does not condone racism and mistreatment of my people.

White student unions create an atmosphere of hatred and prejudice toward people of color on university and college campuses. I personally feel threatened by the sudden increase of white student unions around the country.

Brandeis University faces a critical emergency of racial inequity that requires immediate and concrete action for greater diversity and inclusion for students, staff, and faculty of color. Past mechanisms have not brought the reforms needed. We join our voices to the protesters and urge the University to act for racial equity by implementing a plan that incorporates the concrete measures called for.

As a concerned citizen of Springfield, MO and a member of the black community, I am writing to call attention to the gross and racist treatment being hurled at Dr. Ken Coopwood, the first black VP and senior expert on diversity hired in the history of Missouri State University and our city of Springfield. Other VPs on campus, who happen to be white, earn more in salary and have better funded divisions. I have been in Springfield for over 5 years, and I met Dr. Coopwood 2 years ago at a community event sponsored by the Baha'i Faith organization. I became familiar with his work and later attended several visits to his division suite on campus over several months. Having more insight into Dr. Coopwood’s work and his ability to serve a historically hostile community, I can share news of how he has endured over recent years. I know that of late, Dr. Coopwood’s division was “repurposed” for the sake of doing higher level activity, e.g. climate study, and diversity conference, but left internal units without leadership for the change these efforts should provoke. This repurposing was stated in the Springfield “News Leader” and it caused several diversity-related units to be left without the benefit of his expertise and leadership. However, I’ve learned through students and others in the community that, in fact, staff within Dr. Coopwood’s division have been despicable and hostile towards him, even created circumstances against him which made his leadership appear to be both faulty and unethical in an effort to gain favor with senior administration. I saw for myself, when asking about his division's budget and how his staff were being utilized, that his effort to develop his staff and expand the work of his division was not being supported in any way that proved the university was serious about diversity. In fact, it appears that Dr. Coopwood’s unit and his resources have been taken away to show favor to others at MSU who were known by the president before him. We need to find out the truth. I have spoken directly to Dr. Coopwood but he needs to protect his family and therefore can not respond in depth to my questions. Nonetheless, I am starting this petition to demand that the treatment afforded to Dr. Coopwood be revealed publicly and that he be allowed to use his talent to lead the community to better race relations and equitable distribution of resources. I have the support of MSU alums as well as community people who have worked directly with Dr. Coopwood. I will ask the MSU board to investigate Dr. Coopwood’s experience since arriving in Springfield and, if need be, move this petition forward to the attention of the Governor. We can not stand by and watch a man who brought his family to our community be racially profiled as incompetent, not-valued or of no consequence in transforming our community to a better place. If any of you have interacted with Dr. Coopwood in any way, then you would know what I mean. Please join me in holding the university accountable for its treatment of the first and only black executive since 1905.

It is estimated that property rentals will continue to rise as home-ownership is becoming further out of reach. As demand increases, landlords will be given increased opportunity to select their renters from a pool of eligible candidates. It is up to us to show landlords that declining equally qualified minority renters will not be tolerated, instead we demand fairness and integrity.

DCS has destroyed and torn apart not just my family but several others. They place children, but with people who haven't even really changed and go right back to doing the same thing. I've seen them give kids back in just a few short months and close the case soon after and something starts all over again. The parents who want their children can't seem to get them back. The department lies and makes false promises to parents. They don't try to help families or care how it is affecting everyone as a whole. Myself personally have dealt and are still dealing with them and the department along with the therapist who sees my older children and has them convinced that I don't want them or love them. I have my youngest daughter, whom the department failed to inform the court of when my rights where terminated, and failed to inform the court that I owned my place. And, my attorney was no help. When I filed my appeal, I was told I could continue seeing my children with no change. As of October, they took my visits away and informed me they were moving forward with adoption and to treat my case as if there was no appeal in place. They had set up a goodbye visit without asking if I was available, and when I wanted to change the date because I had to work, the therapist told the caseworker that I didn't want to see my children, so now they are denying me a goodbye visit. They won't answer any of my questions. Now they are doing the same thing to a friend of mine; they told her to clean her house and then her children can come home. Her home is clean and they are not letting them come home. I love my children and want them home. Something needs to be done about DCS. I've never hurt my children or neglected them. They always had clothes, food, beds, and have never been abused. There are people who are starving their children and beating their children and nothing happens to them until it's too late. My children went to private schools and were active in their school. Please sign this petition to put a stop to DCS and have something done. Thanks

We are enraged with ISIS for killing people who do not agree with their extreme Islamic beliefs. Yet about two weeks ago, Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, and Mike Huckabee attended and spoke at the National Religious Liberties Conference in Des Moines, Iowa. At that conference Kevin Swanson spoke at length about the Bible saying we can kill people for being homosexual. This is not an acceptable stance for someone who wants to be President of the United States.

We are speaking up to protect the rights of California's homeowners and tenants. California has strict foreclosure laws that must be followed exactly or the foreclosure sale is VOID, and strict laws for Unlawful Detainer to protect residents from illegal eviction. Much of California's housing crisis is caused by judges who fail to enforce these laws in thousands of individual cases, and by our Attorney General and District Attorneys who fail to prosecute housing crimes. Governor Brown and all our lawmakers say they are concerned about our deficient budget, unemployment, homelessness, and the shortage of affordable housing. STOP the second wave of this statewide scandal, and keep people in their rightful homes! CHIEF JUSTICE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE (http://www.courts.ca.gov/chiefjustice.htm), who also heads the California Judicial Council (http://www.courts.ca.gov), must collaborate with California's OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (https://oag.ca.gov/) and Governor Brown to guide the judges and protect against illegal foreclosures and evictions. JUDGES should investigate the paperwork and procedures in any Unlawful Detainer (eviction) case that follows a foreclosure sale, housing discrimination, or any other questionable activity. Fraudulent, counterfeit, robo-signed documents are NOT LEGAL and must not be allowed to substitute for legal documents. Any VOID foreclosure sale means the buyer CANNOT evict the residents. When speculators realize they cannot evict after a VOID sale, they will stop buying the houses at auction, and lenders who must keep these homes might be more motivated to modify the loans. Right now, the lenders (loan servicers) refuse to modify loans because they get more cash when they sell the house. Notice the low participation rate of lenders in the Keep Your Home California (KYHC) principal reduction program (PRP): http://keepyourhomecalifornia.org (Scroll down to Resources and click "Reports and Statistics" to find a map of California, where a mouse click reveals loan modifications by county.) ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS must restore funding to assist foreclosure victims. As of June 30, 2015, homeowners no longer have assistance from the California Monitor (https://oag.ca.gov/mortgagesettlement) to report violations of CA Homeowner Bill of Rights, and no longer have legal assistance for themselves or their attorneys through California Homeowner Bill of Rights Resources (http://calhbor.org/ see "Note to readers" at bottom of page). ATTORNEYS and JUDGES should follow the case law and legal guidance provided by reputable sources, including the website for California Homeowner Bill of Rights Collaborative (http://calhbor.org/resources/). __Protections for California Tenants in Foreclosed Homes (updated May 2014) [PDF] http://www.calhbor.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Foreclosure-memo-6.4.2014.pdf __ Representing California Tenants & Former Homeowners in Post-Foreclosure Evictions (Updated through April 1, 2015), including when to CONSOLIDATE an Unlawful Detainer case with a Wrongful Foreclosure case, so the victim of unlawful attempt at eviction to stay in the home while the court examines the evidence. http://calhbor.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Post-FC-Eviction-PG-Apr-2015-update-FINAL.pdf __Litigating under California’s Homeowner Bill of Rights & Nonjudicial Foreclosure Framework (Updated through June 2015), explains how to enforce California's Homeowner Bill of Rights, which was championed by Attorney General Kamala Harris and signed into law by CA Governor Jerry Brown to protect homeowners as they apply for a loan modification. http://calhbor.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/PG-June-2015-update.pdf Video of signing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8g0P0sRwR0 DISTRICT ATTORNEYS should use their Foreclosure Crisis Recovery Funds Grants ($5.2 million total) from Attorney General Kamala Harris to combat mortgage and foreclosure fraud. See how much each county was awarded, and ask, "How was that money really spent?" http://oag.ca.gov/content/grants/fcrfg-awards EVERYONE: Send this petition to judges, attorneys, lawmakers, real estate professionals, bank employees, community activists, home defenders, reporters and anyone who who cares about housing rights.

This week, at least 29 republican governors have said they oppose letting Syrian immigrants into their state following the tragic attacks in Paris. Unlike Europe, which has been overwhelmed by the crisis, the U.S. has a thorough vetting process for every refugee who is allowed to enter the United States. The typical process takes between 18 and 24 months. Furthermore, under the U.S. Constitution, governors can’t deny any group of people entry to their state, nor can they determine our federal refugee policy, which is set by the president. Statements attacking Syrian refugees make no one safer and create an environment where racist attacks are more prevalent. We can be a strong, secure country and a welcoming, moral one at the same time.

South-East Human Rights Coalition Warns Military Chiefs In Nigeria We, the Coalition of Southeast Human Rights Organizations, comprising the Anambra State Branch of Civil Liberties Organization (CLO), International Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law (Intersociety), Center for Human Rights & Peace Advocacy, Human Rights Club (a project of LRRDC), Southeast Good Governance Forum, Forum for Equity, Justice & Defense of Human Rights, Society Advocacy Watch Project, Anambra Human Rights Forum and PADDI Foundation; wish to align ourselves with the earlier statement issued by our leading Coalition Partner (International Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law) over the above subject. The statement is reproduced below as follows: “Our immediate and prompt attention has been drawn to a statement made by the Nigerian Army yesterday in Abuja, in which it issued a stern warning with vivid reference to millions of Nigerian citizens who are peacefully and non violently asserting through non violence and peaceful assembly and association, their regional and international rights to self determination. Such rights are also constitutionally guaranteed by the 1999 Constitution in the form of rights to personal liberty and peaceful assembly, as well as rights to freedom of association and movement, and they are contained and enshrined in Sections 35, 40 and 41 of the Fundamental Human Rights Charter of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Nigerian Army had in its statement, titled: “Reminder on Nigerian Army Rule of Engagement for Internal Security Operations”: “the Nigerian Army would like to send an unequivocal warning to all and sundry, more specifically to all those threatening and agitating for the dismemberment of the country”. The statement is in vivid reference to the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), which has in the past one week grabbed global attention with sweeping marches in major cities of Nigeria and foreign countries. The army statement further said: “The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (FRN), 1999 (as amended) vide Sect 217 (2) (c) provides that the Armed Forces of Nigeria (AFN) shall suppress insurrection and act in aid of civil authority to restore order when called upon to do so by the President, Commander-in-Chief. This provision is reinforced by Sect (8) (1) and (3) of the Armed Forces Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, (LFN) 2004. This presupposes that troops have to use necessary force to quell crisis resulting in deaths, injury and damages to properties”. We wish to state firmly that the Army statement is totally incoherent with and unknown to the 1999 Constitution, particularly its Fundamental Human Rights Charter. It is also a clear misinterpretation of the 1999 Constitution, particularly its Section 217, which clearly states that “there shall be an armed forces for the Federation” and not “the army for the Federation”. The “armed forces” include other recognized armed forces segments like navy, air force, DSS, etc. That is to say that the view of “the Nigerian Army” cannot represent the collective view of “the Nigerian Armed Forces” and the Nigerian Army is not “the Nigerian Armed Forces”. The statement also failed woefully to understand the common meaning of “suppressing insurrection”. The word “insurrection” is a military act of rising in revolt, rebellion, or resistance against civil authority or an established government or a range of violent behaviors aimed at destroying or taking over the position of an established authority such as a government, president, governor, or political leader. When compared with the activities of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), a self-determination pressure group, the stern warning or riot act so issued is totally misguided, vexatious, shallow, dubiously intended and constitutionally incoherent. The stern warning or riot act was also grossly misdirected, as it ought to have been directed to the Boko Haram terror insurgents who have severally disclosed their intention to violently destroy the country’s existing socio-legal system and put in place radical Islamic theocracy. To date, the IPOB pressure group and millions of its supporters have not used or advocated violence. We see the stern warning or riot act as a clear declaration by the Nigerian Army of an intention to commit crimes against humanity by indicating its readiness to deploy and use brute force to “suppress” ongoing peaceful and non violent processions involving the IPOB pressure group and its teeming supporters. From the body language of the Nigerian Army, it may most likely stage-manage or create group violence, arson, vandalism and damages to property so as to find grounds to deploy and use brute force as well as justification of same. We wish to warn and remind the leadership of the Nigerian Army not to forget that there still exists International Criminal Court and other formidable local and international mechanisms through which its commanding officers found engaged in “brutal suppression or quelling” of ongoing peaceful and non violent protests shall be held accountable for crimes against humanity. Let the Nigerian Army also be reminded that during the recent economic meltdown in USA, some States agitated to secede from the United States, yet they were not tagged “insurrectionists” warranting “military suppression”. Even in the present United Kingdom, Scotland, which agitates for secession, has not been militarily crushed. It is unarguably a case of “crimes against humanity” when brute force is deployed to crush a people asserting non-violently for fair belongingness and fortification of their ethnic identity”. Beyond our alignment and total agreement with the referenced statement above, we wish to further demand for the immediate removal and replacement of the Service Chiefs, particularly the Chief of Air Staff and the Chief of Army Staff. Their open threats and comments are attestation of th...

In 1838, Georgetown University president Thomas Mulledy sold 272 human beings of African descent, legally owned by the Jesuit religious order, to Louisiana in order to cover the school's debts. To this day, Georgetown has a resident hall named after this slave owner. Like the confederate flag flying on state grounds, memorials to slave owners have no place in this society. As part of a growing student and social movement, Georgetown University students are sitting in at school president John J. DeGioia's office until our demands are met. Support our students, our demands and our movement.

It's about the injustice he has done to this loving couple because they are gay. Because of this, he has removed the child from their home and put the child in a heterosexual home because he and his religion believe gays are not fit to be parents. He needs to be removed from office.