-
Anti-Keystone XL pipelineWe dislike the idea of a pipe filled with oil going under a large water source or in Nebraska at all. We chose this as our school subject and our goal is to stop it.90 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Anti-Keystone XL pipeline
-
Save Utah's ParksI am a Sierra Club member who sees that this reclassification of National Monuments and public lands will do irreparable harm to our state, both now and in the future. As someone who spends most of my vacations in these locations, I am alarmed at the possibility that they will be destroyed by corporate development.120 of 200 SignaturesCreated by Robert Mutascio
-
Save California's ParksI am a Sierra Club member who sees that this reclassification of National Monuments and public lands will do irreparable harm to our state, both now and in the future. As someone who spends most of my vacations in these locations, I am alarmed at the possibility that they will be destroyed by corporate development.105 of 200 SignaturesCreated by Robert Mutascio
-
Tell Trump: Don't pull out of Paris Climate AgreementThe Trump Administration is considering pulling the United States out of the Paris Agreement, currently the world’s best chance at slowing climate change. The Paris Agreement is an agreement dealing with greenhouse gases emissions mitigation, adaptation and finance starting in the year 2020. The language of the agreement was negotiated by representatives of 195 countries at the 21st Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC in Paris and adopted by consensus. Climate change may be the most important challenge humanity has ever faced. The Paris Agreement -- ratified last year -- stands as an unprecedented global pact among 196 nations to take steps to prevent catastrophic climate change and ensure a cleaner, safer planet for future generations. U.S. participation in the agreement deserves our support more than ever to ensure it remains strong. The Obama administration had promised the world that the United States would reduce its emissions by 26 to 28 percent below its 2005 levels by the year 2025. If the United States pulls out it will effectively be the end of the agreement.7,327 of 8,000 SignaturesCreated by Greyroots Action
-
Oppose US withdrawal from the Paris Climate AgreementEveryone is affected by climate change and the resulting damage to environment, health and economic prosperity.22 of 100 SignaturesCreated by laura lustig
-
No Pipeline Under the Potomac!The company behind Keystone XL wants to build a fracked-gas pipeline through Western Maryland. If built, the Eastern Panhandle Expansion project would transport fracked gas from Pennsylvania to West Virginia, crossing through Maryland and under the Potomac River and the C&O Canal along the way. More than 6 million people get their drinking water from the Potomac River, and this pipeline project would jeopardize the quality of the water they depend on. Governor Hogan recently signed the statewide ban on fracking into law, and now he has the chance to protect the drinking water for millions of Marylanders again by denying the Clean Water Act certification that is required for this pipeline to move forward. Urge him to deny the Eastern Panhandle Expansion project's 401 Water Quality Certificate.364 of 400 SignaturesCreated by Miranda Carter
-
States United of America for Paris climate accords.President Trump wants to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. We ask you to join with others States concerned with protecting our Earth and form a States United of America that will join the agreement and agree to meet the goals of the accord.28 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Rollie Smith
-
New York Times: Bret Stephens Must GoBret Stephens is a bigot and climate-science denier. He has a Constitutional right to share his attacks on Muslims, women, climate scientists. However, he doesn't deserve the payment and prestige of the New York Times. Stephens' first column, "Climate of Complete Certainty," was riddled with misleading statements and factual missteps. Stephens' work is in service of a campaign of deceit devised by ExxonMobil and other members of the fossil-fuel industry—which has been well reported by the Times. For years, the Times ran misleading and false ads by ExxonMobil attacking climate science on its opinion pages. Thankfully, that past error has since been corrected. Since the election of Donald Trump, the Times has been running an ad campaign claiming the paper's leadership believes "The Truth Is More Important Than Ever." It is time for the Times to remain consistent with its professed respect for the truth, reverse its hiring error and let Bret Stephens go.5,581 of 6,000 SignaturesCreated by Climate Hawks Vote
-
South Mountain Road O and R SUB STATIONPreserve the beauty and integrity of our Historic Neighborhood. The sub station could potentially expose our community to health hazards, destroy the water supply, create noise pollution and definitely decrease the property values.100 of 200 SignaturesCreated by Jamie Block
-
Tell the New Hampshire General Court: Stop the Northern Pass!Hydro-Québec, Canada’s mega power company, wants to build the “Northern Pass” – 1,100 power towers across 180 miles of New Hampshire’s forest and farmland. These gigantic towers would cut through the heart of the White Mountain National Forest and on to power New England.173 of 200 SignaturesCreated by Steve Marchand for Governor
-
SAVE OUR SHORELINETurning a blind eye to the planned Federal destruction of wetlands, historic sites, homes, and communities in spite of the fact that there have been no environmental impact studies or public input is not acceptable. The case in point is the Branford to Guilford Quad track expansion proposed by the Federal Railroad Administration. The FRA’s Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has no environmental studies specific to the new track planned between Branford and Guilford. Equally outrageous is the fact that the FRA failed to inform the “at risk” communities of their intentions. In addition, there is no benefit to the people of New Haven, Branford, or Guilford (or anyone else in Connecticut for that matter). In the entire thousand plus page report, only twenty-nine words were devoted to this 150 to 300 foot wide eight mile long easement. None of those words referenced an environmental study specific to the new track proposed. Furthermore, the exact location of the new track was not provided. This is just another example of a government “Bridge to Nowhere.” This portion needs to be removed from the FRA’s plans.475 of 500 SignaturesCreated by Jon Wilson
-
Ban Fracking in the Delaware River Basin, Don't Approve Drilling Regs!The moratorium on fracking in the Delaware River Basin may be at risk! We know that the Delaware River Basin Commission has been discussing fracking regulations that, if approved, would lift the moratorium on fracking in the Basin. We're not about to let the DRBC expose the communities and natural resources in the Delaware River Basin to fracking's devastation, nor will we allow the Commission to put at risk the drinking water supply of 17 million people! Your signature will send a message to the DRBC commissioners and executive staff that it's time to ban fracking outright!10,220 of 15,000 SignaturesCreated by Karen Feridun