In 2004 and 2008, Nathan Sproul and his company were hired by the Republican National Committee. Their "job" was the elimination of many thousands of Democratic registrations via disposal, destruction, and disinformation...as well as fabricating many Republican registrations. All of this has been enough to shift state voting results. Late last year, the Romney campaign hired him to similarly poison this year’s election. Fortunately, Florida officials recently discovered and exposed his tricks, and a criminal investigation is under way in that state. THAT’S NOT ENOUGH. Since Sproul was hired to work in numerous states, that makes it a national conspiracy , and thus calls for a Federal (i.e. Dep’t. of Justice) investigation and action. The voters need to know about this scheme as soon as possible. If Attorney General Holder held a press conference to announce an investigation and explain the scheme (including the RNC’s repeated hiring of Sproul), the nation’s voters would finally know what’s been done to our elections - and is, again - and who’s behind it. WE MUST MAKE THIS HAPPEN BEFORE THIS ELECTION. So, as soon as you can, please sign this petition, spread it out, and GET IT MULTIPLIED AS MUCH AS YOU CAN.

It is truly scary what we have recently learned about sitting US congressmen's beliefs about matters of science -- things that GOP House Science Committee congressmen Paul Broun (GA) and Todd Akin (MO) (and others) believe that are at odds with uncontroversial tenets of science, like the age of the earth (billions of years old, not 9000), or that a woman's body cannot defend itself against pregnancy caused by rape. While (as much as we might like to) we can't impose an IQ test on candidates for office, or make scientifically valid beliefs a condition of serving in Congress, we need to know about core beliefs of would-be candidates for national offices -- whether they are rational, or bordering on insane. While we cannot legislate the availability of such information, we should be able to expect that reporters and journalists will ferret out such information in their normal pursuit of profitable news and in pursuit of recognition for journalistic excellence.

Representative Paul Broun from the House Committee of Science, Space and Technology recently gave a speech at a banquet in which he made statements that condemn scientific advances and claim them to be false and ploys of Satan! He said "All that stuff that I was taught about evolution and embryology and Big Bang Theory, all that is lies strait from the pit of hell. And it's lies to try to keep me and all the folks who are taught from understanding that they new a savior." This is not acceptable rhetoric for a member of the Congressional Science committee. His thoughts and feelings are his own and protected and he is entitled to his own beliefs, but when his beliefs begin to put at danger the rights of the American public then he should not be placed in position that would allow for such a conflict of interests.

We had an argument about women can't vote and know they do,why not kids can't vote.We all have the same rights why does the age matter.

The superpac fund that allows unlimited money to be donated to a presidential candidate and restore complete transparency revealing all donations over $5000.00 from any entity including private donations.

The superpac fund that allows unlimited money to be donated to a presidential candidate and restore complete transparency revealing all donations over $5000.00 from any entity including private donations.

Is This What Democracy Looks Like? In 9 out of 10 congressional elections, the candidate who spends the most money wins. Nearly $20 million in political ads have been purchased on Denver’s top 4 stations. That buys 18,956 ads; at 30 seconds each, it would take 158 hours to watch them all. Of the $230 million raised by Super PACs from individuals in the first two quarters of the 2012 election cycle, more than half (57.1%) came from just 47 people giving at least $1 million. Just over 1,000 donors giving $10,000 or more were responsible for 94% of this fundraising. We CAN Get Big Money out of Politics. We can correct the errors of the Citizens United ruling by passing an amendment to the U.S. Constitution authorizing limits on campaign contributions and spending that ensure that all of us, regardless of wealth, have an equal voice in our democracy. www.VoteYeson65.org

I think it's time to get rid of both party's and start electing people who would represent the people, then we could get the crooks out of Washington. Theirs nothing wrong with are constitution it's the party's that are taken all this money from the crooks that want to buy this country. Let's see how many people sign this to make the change, then we can open up the talks.

We need to consider term limits for the Presidency to make his one term more effective. There is too much important time wasted on campaigning for a second term and too little time to implement important changes.

Part of the stalemate in congress, the Senate in this case, arises because we have a rule that we need 60% support before we even take up a bill. That is a ludicras requirement. It affects discussion of bills and limits compromises.

One of the biggest sources of corruption in today's politicians is their "lifetime legislator" status. Their focus becomes more on being re-elected term after term than serving for say 6-8 years then going back to their regular life. For many years serving in this capacity was volunteer work, not a career; it should go back to that.

Almost 300 Senators and Representatives have signed the "Taxpayers Protection Pledge" begun by Grover Norquist. It leaves no room for compromise on federal taxation and loopholes in order to reduce the debt and avert the impending financial cliff. We voters pledge that we will only vote for candidates who take a pledge to put the needs of the country above rigid ideology and reelection concerns. Candidates take notice: if you are unwilling to engage in the democratic process, including reasonable compromise, you will not get our votes. On this we will not compromise.