-
Rebuilding life after divorce.It seems unconstitutional that indivduals have been denied the right to pursue happiness when their cases are dependent upon on them remaining in stressful living arrangements while litigious participants prolong the process. Legal staff recognize them, but the judicial machine is financially supported by these costly and frivolous motions. Families are kept in limbo and abusive individuals are allowed a forum for continued abuse. There must be a cap on the time and cost it takes to get a stipulation of settlement. Perhaps a percentage formula can be instituted in the law! One that addresses a cap on a divorce for certain income ranges, as well as new discussion about child support and factors such as comparable incomes between ex- spouses and the residence of the children.3 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Cynthia H.Fletcher
-
HAVING CHILDREN FOR PROFITTHE "WELFARE QUEENS" WHO REPEAT PREGNANCIES FOR MONTHLY TAXPAYER DOLLARS.....WHO IS PROTECTING THE TAXPAYERS FROM THIS TYPE OF "EXTORTION"?1 of 100 SignaturesCreated by MRS. GAIL RUBIO
-
1 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Summer-Sullivan
-
Benefits for 1st respondersSince our armed services receive special treatment because they are putting their lives in danger for the public. I'd like to start a petition requesting that 1st responders also receive similar benefits. They, also, put their lives in danger for all of us.1 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Karen Massaro
-
Allow Disabled Persons to Marry Without Loss of BenefitsIndividuals who qualify for social security disability on either their parent's or their grandparent's benefits are discriminated against when it comes to marriage. These are people who became disabled before the age of 22 and did not work enough qualifying hours (ie tax paying job) to have enough of their own social security benefits to qualify. When they sign a marriage certificate they automatically lose all of their disability benefits, including monthly stipend and medicare health insurance. How is this fair? Is the assumption that once you're married your spouse can provide monthly income and health insurance for the disabled person, or that they're any less disabled? We need to fix the broken system that prevents disabled persons from marrying as this is flat out discrimination.58 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Laura Roy
-
Child Abuse Victom needs your helpThe other day my God Daughter called my wife up crying after watching a video... (WARNING THIS VIDEO CONTAINS CHILD ABUSE AND IS DISTURBING TO WATCH. SMALL CHILDREN SHOULD NOT BE IN THE ROOM WHEN PLAYING THIS VIDEO. IF AT WORK PLEASE LOWER THE VOLUME) VIDEO LINK: http://youtu.be/pMQQBuMeusQ A friend of hers posted on Facebook. In the video, what appears to be a 4-6 months old child is clearly being abused. Whats not clear is who the abuser is (mother/caretaker, etc.). The issue is that there is no one to defend that child and its not clear if the child may already be DEAD!4 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Q Fortune
-
Fix Social Security!If you're the non-earning spouse, and are divorced for any reason, you are no longer entitled to the Social Security paid by the earning spouse during the years of your marriage! This is our government telling stay-at-home parents that the work they do has no value.2 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Kathlyn Starbuck
-
Arizona UnemployedArizona the Only State not getting Federal Funded Extended Beneifits for its Unemployed.Our Republican Run State Legislature will not let have this funds for over a year now.3 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Frank
-
NATIONAL MONORAIL SERVICEFederal Gov. construction of a Nation-Wide Monorail system running up the middle of the Interstate Hwy System. The Monorail would run above the ground on pylons and would provide passenger service (including auto transport), freight service and US mail service. All interstate trans would be required to use it--NO exceptions. Airlines would relenquish their Fed subsidies to support this. Construction would be done by Federal employees--under a WPA like system. Materials would be purchased from an approved list of vendors who could prove NO lobbying and NO connections to Gov. employees or elective officials. A date would be set for completion---ie: 20 yrs. (think Pres. Kennedy's pledge to land a man on the moon in less than 10 yrs.). This legislation and the resulting program would result in the following: job creation on a massive scale, reduction of carbon emissions, safe and effective travel, safe and effective freight transport, reduction (drastic) in fuel consumption, rapid interstate travel, convenience (no waiting to board a plane--get to an airport etc.), smog reduction, less stress for travelers with children and reduced cost for families. These are only a few of the countless benefits. They address the most crucial crises facing our country: employment, fuel consumption, foreign control of fuel supplies, pollution, global warming, safety, erroding infrastructure, transportation. It is NOT a matter of "if"---it is a matter of MUST!!!38 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Rev. Carter A. Dary
-
Save the Post OfficeWe need to stop the dismantling of the postal service under the guise of "economic reforms." The post office is not a money'making enterprize. It is a public service and ought to be jbranded as such, funded as such, and guaranteed in perpetuity as such.14 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Sylvia Levine
-
Stand Up for the Health of Maine's Kids and SeniorsGovernor Paul LePage and his Republican allies in the Maine Legislature are on the verge of making deep cuts to critical services. Targeted are the Fund for a Healthy Maine, Drugs for the Elderly, and Head Start. The budget ax would nearly eliminate state funding for early childhood education. All this, while the Governor continues to cut taxes for those already prospering. We are calling on Maine Legislators to reject these attempts to dismantle important services that promote public health and offer help to at-risk children and seniors.5,412 of 6,000 SignaturesCreated by Jon Hinck
-
Stop SB #1466--budget cuts for disabled individuals!We thank the PA appropriations committee for their restoration of the 20% cuts that were originally proposed. We have 10% more to fight for! Senate Bill #1466 would cut that funding. Let's tell our state senate and house of representatives to leave these funds untouched!22 of 100 SignaturesCreated by Maria Cipollone